And So I Go: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow

Pope calls for a UN ‘with teeth’ and a One World Government

Posted by: brendabowers on: July 9, 2009

BC NEWS | Europe | Pope calls for a UN ‘with teeth’

I was actually stunned when I saw this article where Pope Benedict XVI  is calling for the United Nations to be reformed and to become the head of a Global Authority.

The Pope has called for reform of the United Nations and financial bodies, giving them the “real teeth” needed to tackle economic and social injustice.

His encyclical letter said a reformed UN should strive for disarmament, food security and environmental protection. An encyclical letter is the highest form of papal teaching.

“There is a strongly felt need… for a reform of the United Nations Organisation, and likewise of economic institutions and international finance, so that the concept of the family of nations can acquire real teeth… there is urgent need of a true world political authority,” the Pope wrote.

The strengthened international body should work “to bring about integral and timely disarmament, food security and peace, to guarantee the protection of the environment and to regulate migration,” Benedict said.

“Profit is useful if it serves as a means toward an end,” he wrote.

“Once profit becomes the exclusive goal, if it is produced by improper means and without the common good as its ultimate end, it risks destroying wealth and creating poverty.”

He warned that globalisation, properly managed, could “open up the unprecedented possibility of large-scale redistribution of wealth on a world-wide scale”.  (where have we heard this before?  BB)

But badly directed, it could “lead to an increase in poverty and inequality, and could even trigger a global crisis”.

Now I will explain why this article stopped me in my tracks when I read it:

Those of you who have read the Left Behind Series of books will remember the Church is especially helpful to the Anti-Christ   in cementing his control over the world.  The Church is depicted as the Whore of Babylon  of the Book of Revelations.

Left Behind‘ is a series of 16 best-selling novels by Tim LaHaye and Jerry B. Jenkins, dealing with Christian dispensationalist End Times: pretribulation, premillennial, Christian eschatological viewpoint of the end of the world.

Now perhaps a few more connecting of dots for those of you who enjoy this sort of  mind games:  the Prophecies of Nostradamus as concerns the antichrist.

Nostradamus warned of three Antichrists who would be so powerful as to take peace from the whole earth. To understand who these Antichrists are we must first understand the meaning of the word Christ.

Christ is an English translation of the Greek word Christos, and in Hebrew this word is translated as Messiah. It means anointed one and refers to the genealogy of kingship. In the times before Jesus, all the Kings in the Davidic line were called Messiah or more completely Messiah-ben-David, as they were anointed on the forehead with olive oil by the High Priest. In those days they fueled their lamps with olive oil, so in reference to kings it was symbolical to their enlightenment. But during the Jews captivity in Babylon, the Prophets Isaiah, Daniel and Ezekiel, prophesied that two of these descendants from David would be anointed not by the High Priest but by God himself with the Holy Spirit. Jesus, being descended from David through King Solomon’s brother Nathan, was the first of these two prophesied Christs. The meaning of the word Christ, therefore, is a male-sperm lineal descendant of King David who is anointed.

Nostradamus understood the meaning of the word Antichrist and knew well that it did not refer as so many think merely  being against Jesus Christ.  Jesus was a direct linear descendant of King David and therefore  the title of Christ was applied to his name.  The antichrist would also of course be against the teaching of Jesus but this is not why the name antichrist is used by Nostradamus.

The antichrist would be men who were so powerful as to cause war and death and great hardship on the world.

The first two antichrists Nostradamus predicted are Napoleon and Hitler. Napoleon was the first Anti-Christ as the belief (erroneously) at his time was that the kings of Europe claimed lineage back to David and were Divinely appointed to there position. He made war on these kings as well as the Pope, who claims to be the Vicar of Christ on earth. Hence, Antichrist #1. Hitler he prophesied by name, but he was off by one letter, spelling it Hister. Hitler on the other hand was aware that the Heir to the Throne would come from the line of David and the House of Judah and was prophesied to rule over the whole earth. He therefore figured in order for himself to rule the world he must extinguish this lineage, but not knowing which Jew was descended from David, he attempted to kill them all. Thus, Antichrist #2.

But, the third Antichrists is the most terrible of them all. The first two Antichrists didn’t know who was the heir, but the third one did know, didn’t make any mistake and has attempted to end the lineage.

Who is the Third Antichrist?
( http://www.faqs.org/faqs/nostradamus/part3/ )

Many people have tried to understand these prophecies but to no avail. Let us now look at prophecies of Nostradamus’ associated with the third Antichrist.

Century II quatrain 62

Mabus will soon die and there will come
A dreadful destruction of people and animals,
Suddenly vengeance will be revealed,
Hundred, hands, thirst and hunger when the comet will pass.

Century VI quatrain 33

His hand finally through the bloody ALUS,
He will be unable to protect himself by sea,
Between two rivers he will fear the military hand,
The black and angry one will make him repent of it.

In Erika Cheetham’s book The Prophecies of Nostradamus on page 261 she explains that the name of the third antichrist is tied up in these two quatrains. She entitles this section, “Name of the Third Antichrist?” She then goes on to say…

“ALUS is another unsolved mystery. I wonder if this connects with the fearsome Mabus of II. 62?”

ALUS is ALlied US forces; i.e. the countries that assisted the US in the Gulf War, and Mabus is Saddam Hussein. When we hold this name Mabus up to the mirror we get sudaM. Mabus = sudaM. Sudam is Saddam Hussein.

I p189 (cIII-34)

The Antichrist will spend many years working silently behind the
scenes to consolodate his power, and make his appearance onto the
international arena once the structure is in place. He will have
planned carefully and the countries he goes against will be
unprepared for his golden-tongued treachery.

I p 190 (cVIII-77)

The Antichrist is the power behind the scenes, pulling the strings,
and has not yet made his move to reveal himself. He is like a spider
waiting for his time, taking advantage of the world situation to make
his move. 

I p 180 

When his time comes he will take advantage of the political situation
in a country to rise to power. It will not matter that he is not a
native of the country. He will take advantage of loopholes and
contrive positions. He may aggressively and audaciously seize a
position  in a military organization after his uncle dies, for
example.

I p 234 (cI-34)

The Antichrist will foment rebellions within the countries he's aiming
to take over. He will allow the various political splinter groups to
believe he supports their cause, when he is actually playing them
against each other. The countries will turn in on themselves,
weakening them for his outside conquest.

I p 219 (cII-23)

The Antichrist will take over Iran by using a human decoy to trick the
Ayatollah in power. This will involve the "yes men" and sycophants of
the Ayatollah's court. The Antichrist will first drive away internal
supporters of the Ayatollah by starting a civil war. Then he will put
forth a man as a leader, a man for Iranians loyal to the Ayatollah to
concentrate their hate on. The man will be assassinated while Iran is
being taken over, and his opponents will think they have foiled the
overthrow of power by assassinating him. But they will find out later
he was merely a decoy and that they played into the plans of the
Antichrist.

I p 211 (cII-81)

The Antichrist will initially obtain power in his own sphere, Asia,
and the Middle East.
As he grows out of this arena, i.e. into Europe,
the next step will be into the Mediterranean, approaching from the
south, his area of strength. Because of his Middle Eastern heritage
he will have already united North Africans, who are sympathetic to his
cultural background, with his Asian and Middle Eastern conglomerate.

b. Antichrists' unified monetary system
===

I p 219 (cI-40)

The Antichrist will start uniting the monetary systems of his region
to help merge them into a single political entity. His ambition to
rule the world will be advanced by instituting a single currency with
others going defunct. There will be a resistance to this,
particularly by a popular, charismatic leader from Egypt, demanding
the edict and law be withdrawn that requires the Arab nations give up
their currencies and be submissive to the unified political
conglomerate.

c. Antichrist's seizure of Asia
===

I p 189 (cIV-50)

The Antichrist will take over Asia by appointing subcommanders to rule
vast tracts of land for him. But their ties to him will be masked and
the world will not realize they are merely puppets until a succession
of them are installed in the place of predecessors. At first the U.S.
will not interfere because it is thought the government was freely
chosen by the people, but only later realize the leaders were forced
on the populace as mouthpieces and tools for the Antichrist.

I p 188 (cIII-95)

Russia will be his first major Asian
conquest and he will do it not through force but through guile and
his  compelling persuasiveness. He will trick the Russians to come
under his power and there will be nothing they can do about it. They
will think they are acting in their own best interests. The Middle
East will be mostly under his control before he turns to Russia. Then
he turns to China and the rest of the Asian continent, to build a
position to take over the entire world. He will not trick the Chinese
but will some other method.

d. Antichrist's cultural eradication & European campaign
===

I p194 (cII-15)

When the second pope is assassinated, the Antichrist will begin his
European campaign. The Prime Minister of Britain and the U.S.
President will  go into consultation over the matter. They will meet
at sea like Churchill and Roosevelt did for better security and
secrecy of the meetings.

I p 211 (cII-81)

During the use of his weapons and the ravages of war,  one of the
devastatingly effective plans of attack by the Antichrist is to
threaten the destruction of the victim's cultural centers, not so
much physical destruction of the populace. Because the population
attributes great  value to places and artifacts with large historical
and cultural  significance, the terrorist-extortionist technique will
be very powerful in striking fear into his foe and "bringing them to
their knees".

To put Europe into an initial shock, he will begin to smash and
destroy the city of Rome to rubble via aerial bombing raids. It will
be destroyed to such an extent that the "seven hills of Rome" will be
levelled. Rome will be be so annhilated as to be  threatened by an
encroachment from the sea, destroying all that is left.

He will also threaten the cultural centers of Greece and the great
Greek cultural centers of learning, including Athens. Most cultural
treasures and major  metropolitan centers of the entire peninsula
will be destroyed. The world leaders will be momentarily shocked and
paralyzed by his barbarity. In the presense of their indeciveness and
absence of their action he will make great strides in taking over
territory and governments. The Antichrist will continually use
shocking and unprecedented moves like these to advance his domination
throughout the entire WWWIII.

The eradication of cultural treasures also fits in with the
Antichrist's ulterior motive of wiping out the established culture to
supplant it with his own, like the Moors attempted when they invaded
Spain, except in his case on the level of an entire continent.

I. p226 (cII-84)

Drought and weather changes will take place during the time of
troubles. The Antichrist will take over Italy and Greece by
destroying the cultural centers to devastate morale of the subjugated
citizens.

e. Antichrist's ravage of the Catholic Church
===

I p214 (cV-43)

In addition to the cultural destruction of European cultural centers,
the Antichrist will ransack the Vatican library with the intent of
ultimately  destroying it. He will do this to undermine the authority
of the Vatican and break up the power fragments that remain. One way
he will do this is by revealing important, controversial material
hidden in the Vatican library that the Catholic church will be seen
to have suppressed because of the threat to its authority. This will
cause major schisms in the church as priests and students turn
against each other in their theories and interpretations of the new
material. The confusion and chaos will remove the Catholic church as
an obstacle to the Antichrist's plans.

I p215 (cI-62)

The ransacking of the Vatican library by the Antichrist will bring to
light and  open to the world information, facts, and knowledge that
had been suppressed for several centuries. Even though he uses
violence, the Antichrist will actually be  burning off his karma
because of the positive effects of the release, starting a new cycle,
higher cycle of his karma.

I p216 (cII-12)

The people involved with the Catholic church, particularly the
priests, will cling to the old order even though it is not viable and
dead as far as working within the reality of the changed times. The
Antichrist and the last pope will be "robbing blind" the Church. The
Antichrist will desecrate and raid the Vatican library and cart away
the treasures of the church to help fund his armies. The Catholic
church will become totally superfluous, and contribute to its own
demise.

f. Antichrist's invasion of Turkey
===

I p 209 (cV-25)

When the Catholic Church in Rome is finally destroyed in a devastating
but mysterious "Act of Nature",  people will be distracted from
noticing the more important event of the time, the Antichrist
invading Turkey.

I p 222 (cII-29,V-54)

After the destruction in Italy wrought by the Antichrist, he will go
over the mountains through France via airplane. He will attack Europe
from the south because he will have the solid backing of the Islamic
world and will already have bloodily subjugated North Africa and the
Middle east. He will set up regional headquarters in Turkey, and
other outposts, to rule and advance further conquests.

g. Switzerland alarmed by Antichrist's Nazism in Germany
===

I p 220 (cI-61)

While the Antichrist is in the process of taking over Europe, he will
back the Nazi party in Germany. The current popularity of Nazism
among the youth of Germany will lay the groundwork for this.
Eventually Switzerland will become alarmed and break its
centuries-old tradition of neutrality, taking the side against the
Antichrist and actively fighting.

I. p 229 (cII-39)

Infiltrators, spies, and traitors in Germany, France, Spain, and Italy
will be secretly working for the Antichrist's cause of taking over
Europe. The education establishment will be abandoned because it is
unsupportable during wartime.

h. International (non)reaction to the Antichrist
===

I p 220 (cII-96)

Diplomatic foul-ups in other countries will permit the Antichrist to
attain greater power. In the beginning, when he does not have a broad
base of power but is building on it, those in power elsewhere who can
do something about it will hesitate until it is too late. Even though
people realize he wields great power "from the dark side", his
demonic hatred and magnetism will enhance the fatal attraction. He
will advance his campaign by invading and conquering neighboring
countries, particularly because of the political turmoil and
instability of the realm. Eventually he will subdue the entire Asian
continent under his rule. The Antichrist will be in this period of
increasing his power during the visit of the comet visible from the
Northern hemisphere in about 1997.

I p 225 (cI-37)

The U.S. will vacillate in dissension during the conquests of the
Antichrist. Its  power, influence, and "can do" capabilities will
have diminished in the international arena at the time. The populace
will argue over involvement vs. noninvolvement. Shipping will be very
dangerous because of submarine warfare practiced by the Antichrist.
Enemy soldiers in foreign ports will foul up sea-based commerce. Many
decisive battles in his wars will involve seaports. Many people will
die far away from home in the war.

I p 224 (cIII-7)

The various weaker countries threatened by the Antichrist's
imperialism will call on stronger ones for help, like the U.S. which
will initially be neutral and uncommitted. The Antichrist will be
attempting to take over part of the world using aerial warfare. In
one battle in the night a squadron of unmarked planes will rebuff his
advance, sent secretly by the U.S.

I p213 (cV-86)

Responsive, proactive countermeasures could have prevented the
destruction caused by the Antichrist but the political and diplomatic
strife among the Western powers will have failed to have "nipped the
situation in the bud". England and the U.S. will have enough military
power to confront the Antichrist but because of lack of consensus
neither will act quickly. A newly established alliance between the
two is only in its infancy at the time, and the powers have not
established the authority of overall decision-making in time. Also, a
breakdown in communications and transportation will cause important
political analysts to be cut off from advising the leaders. Meanwhile
the Antichrist will be making conquests in leaps and bounds.

The above is of course only one persons  interpretation of  the quatrains.  But there are some interesting references  and she may be on the right track but just off a bit.  Look at things from the perspective of today and what we see happening today.

Remember Nostradamus was not aware that the United
States would become the most powerful nation in the future
and therefore perhaps a more likely area of greatest
influence on the world for the antichrist. Nostradamus
just knew that he would not rise to power in Europe.

We also may consider that MABUS doesn’t stand for
Saddam Hussein.  Tho it would be very much like Nostradamus to give the mirror image of the name in his attempt to disguise it as he did all the names.

The three antichrist according to Nostradamus were:

PAU NAY LORON = NAPAULON ROY    His name encoded is “Napoleon King”   Napoleon Bonaparte

HIƒTER = HITLER    ADOLF HITLER

Nostradamus and the  Last Antichrist: Code Named MABUS


Crop circles in UK becoming more intricate. Some wondering why.

Posted by: brendabowers on: July 9, 2009

I have always been intrigued by the crop circles, most of which occur in Great Britain.  I have read many accounts and watched the Discovery Channel accounts and not yet found an explanation for them,  and certainly no one knows how they are formed.  They simply appear overnight.

Some of the ones appearing this summer so far are much more intricate than  ever before.  The depictions are of animals rather than the standard geometric patterns.  Go to the link below offered by  Rundown on the Daily News then follow that link to other stories and pictures and videos.

Enjoy!  BB

“Lastly, a crop circle depicting a 300 foot long hummingbird has appeared in a barley field in the U.K.  (thanks to   Rundown on the Daily News )

US to Re-Settle 1,350 Palestinian Refugees from Iraq

Posted by: brendabowers on: July 9, 2009

US to Re-Settle 1,350 %u2018PA Refugees%u2019 from Iraq – Defense/Middle East – Israel News – Israel National News.

More Palestinian Muslims who are possible terrorist or have ties to terrorist to be resettled in the United States.  I wonder why this is necessary?   Of course I know the answer to this: because President Obama has informed the world that the United States is not a Christian nation, but it is a Muslim nation.  And of course we owe so much of our culture to the Muslims according to President Obama and his stooges in the White House who are pandering to  the Islamic Society of North America.  The ISNA  had their convention in Washington DC this past weekend  and were  taped  selling anti-American and jihad books and materials.  As if this wasn’t bad enough one of Obama’s appointed stooges was a featured speaker.

The U.S. State Department said on Tuesday it will grant asylum to 1,350 Arabs in Iraq who claim to have the right to live in Israel based on ancestry. The unprecedented numbers to be allowed to resettle in the United States may anger Israel, the Christian Science Monitor (CSM) reported.

Most of them lived well in Iraq under former dictator Saddam Hussein but then were thrown out of their homes after his downfall. They were targeted since the American invasion of the country and have been living near the border with Syria.

These people were targeted by  Iraqis not Americans.  The Iraqis as well as most Arab states don’t want anything to do with these people.  Why is that?  could it be that after 60 years and three or more generations of being brainwashed and made into haters and killers they are seen as trouble makers by other Arab Muslims?   But our current administration do not see them in the same light.

The Bush administration rarely accepted Arabs defined as “Palestinian refugees” in order not to irritate Israel, one diplomat told CSM. He said the Arabs will be processed as refugees from Iraq. Todd Pierce, a spokesman for the State Department’s Bureau of Population, Refugees and Migration, said that the Arabs in Iraq are not being equated with those from Judea, Samaria and Gaza.

The Bush administration rarely accepted Arabs defined as Palestinian refugees for the same reason all the Arab nations refuse to have them in their countries!!  Why are they not just resettled in Muslim nations?

Jordan is the only Arab country that grants citizenship to Arabs who claim ancestry in Israel but has not allowed Arabs to enter from Iraq, according to Mark Krikorian, director of the Center for Immigration Studies in Washington.

The latest issue for the Palestinians is to demand that all Palestinians who had at least one ancestor who had lived in what is now Israel  must be allowed to return to Israel.  This is patently against the internationally accepted definition of a refugee.  Only the original person having left or been forced out of  a country is a refugees, whereas future generations are not.  This new twist is being held up now as a ploy to keep the Israeli/Palestinian issue on the burner.  The Palestinians and Arab states do not wish to settle the problem.

A spokesman for the Foreign Ministry told Israel National News that it would not comment on the new American policy. Granting asylum to the Arabs could be interpreted by the Palestinian Authority as official United States acceptance of them as Arabs with a right to live in Israel but who were granted special status because of the American war.

……. the issue a “hot potato” and that the State Department announcement is “tossing their problems over their head into Harrisburg, Pennsylvania or Omaha, Nebraska” and making America “a dumping ground” for its problems. Most of the Iraqi Arabs will be settled in southern California.

So most of these Iraqi Arab Muslims will be settle in southern California?  LOL this is just dandy.   Muslims hate gays and California is  the gay capitol of the United States.  Oh well…..


Schumer: Amnesty Bill for Illegals by Labor Day

Posted by: brendabowers on: July 9, 2009

Newsmax.com – Schumer: Amnesty Bill for Illegals by Labor Day

Is there a Democrat in Congress who understands the words “Slow Down!”  and “No!” ?  There are too many vitally important pieces of legislation all on the drawing board at the same time, and going by what has already been done a whole lot of mistakes are being made.  Stimulus Bill of $784 billion is a failure and and Congress is now talking of perhaps another one.  Health Care is mired down by finally accepting that the costs are simply beyond the ability of the nation to bear and the Democrats in Congress are beating the bushes for more ways to fund what they insist we need rather than look at a more reasonable and better plan.

Now it is a sur tax on the rich that is being bandied about.  I wonder: How rich is rich?  And might the “rich” simply take their riches and move elsewhere in the world?  Companies are moving out of the United States as fast as they can shut down their operations here in order to get away from the rapacious Congressmen looking for money for their nanny state.

So now we have Immigration Reform that has failed again and again because Americans want the borders closed!  Close the borders and then talk of what to do with the illegal aliens who are already here.  Of course President Obama has asked for 15,000 “volunteers”, that is  unarmed volunteers, to trip off to a border town  to serve as unpaid guardians of our borders in the middle of a violent drug war.  Is it any wonder a British columnist calls him the “looney toons President”?

Well I believe we can name Senator Schumer of New York as a looney toons Senator.

By the end of the year or early next year that works out disagreements between labor and business interests on the flow of legal foreign workers.

“I think we’ll have a good bill by Labor Day,” said Schumer, D-N.Y. “I think the fundamental building blocks are in place to do comprehensive immigration reform.”

Schumer said the way to get the bill done is to be very tough on future waves of illegal immigration. He declared himself pro-immigration and said the U.S. should encourage legal immigration and find some kind of path for people now here to find a way to legal citizenship.

The fundamental building blocks Sen. Schumer claims that we have in place are the Obama Administration bill.  See:

Lou Dobbs: Amnesty Bill ProvisionsVideo: Lou Dobbs on Why Obama’s Plan for Illegal Alien Amnesty is a Bad Idea

The AFL-CIO and the Change to Win labor unions earlier this year announced their support for immigration reform, which they have opposed in the past.

But the unions’ continued opposition to increases in visas for foreign workers is at odds with the demand by business for legal foreign workers in industries ranging from high-technology to agriculture.

The unions have always been opposed to  immigration reform for the clear and simple reason that illegal  aliens do not  join labor unions and PAY UNION DUES to make the Mafia union bosses richer.   But now the unions are desperate for members and have had some success unionizing the meat packing industry and slaughter houses who typically employ low level labor which is mostly  aliens.  And since the unions now have a sweet heart deal going with President Obama and the Dems in Congress  to pass the “card check” bill which will take away the right to a secret ballot the unions feel confident they can pick up a whole lot of legalized illegal aliens now working at these low level jobs.

But the unions’ continued opposition to increases in visas for foreign workers is at odds with the demand by business for legal foreign workers in industries ranging from high-technology to agriculture.

This makes sense when you know that legal foreign workers with visas do not have to join American labor unions!  And they certainly have better things to do with their money than to enrich thieves so they do not join.

“We have a shortage maybe of engineers here or Ph.D’s in physics, but we probably don’t have a shortage of people who can do construction work,” Schumer said.

Don’t be fooled by this bit of bull.  Well educated workers have no difficulty getting  legal immigrant status in the United States and never have had.  Immigration reform is not needed for these people.  It is the hordes of possible new low level labor illegal alien workers who can be intimidated into joining a labor union that Senator Schumer is talking about.   He knows very well where his lat campaign funding came from and where the next will come from.  BB

Barack Obama sells out America says British columnist

Posted by: brendabowers on: July 8, 2009

From the Telegraph News, London, England

I think the people of the United States need to read these articles by British reporters on what our President is doing on this trip overseas.  One calls him the “looney toons President” and I have to agree.  the headlines are all “Barack Obama holds fire sale….”

Barack Obama’s foreign policy blundering is now verging on the surreal. When Manuel Zelaya, the socialist president of Honduras, was overthrown, Obama first declared himself “deeply concerned”, then denounced the coup as illegal; now, with the support of the Obama White House, the Organisation of American States has given Honduras a three-day deadline to reinstate Zelaya. This is madness.

Zelaya was unseated by the army, but this was no ordinary military coup. The armed forces were carrying out a decision of the Honduran Supreme Court after it had declared unconstitutional a referendum Zelaya was attempting to hold to extend the length of time he could stay in office. This is a well-known ploy among leftist Latin American leaders in the mould of Hugo Chavez, the Marxist president of Venezuela.

By declaring that the Honduran constitution does not permit such a populist coup by the president, the Supreme Court was upholding the rule of law. Zelaya was attempting to subvert it. By removing him, the army upheld the constitution. Does Obama believe he has the power to overrule the US Supreme Court and the American Constitution by extending his period in office by plebiscite? If not, why should the Honduran constitution be disregarded by that country’s president?

Zelaya is a Chavez-style leftist, aiming at taking Honduras out of the American sphere of influence and into alliance with Marxist Venezuela. Now it emerges his strongest ally is the American president. This is perverse beyond belief and deeply damaging to America’s interests. I ask again: why does Barack Obama hate America?

Allow Russia her sphere of influence, but do not drop the West’s guard. With our
own Dave Cameron flaky on renewal of Trident, Obama’s fire-sale diplomacy
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/geraldwarner/100002433/barack-obama-holds-a-fire-sale-of-americas-nuclear-defences-in-moscow/
Barack Obama: the Looney Tunes President’s sell-out of US and Western interests is proceeding at such a speed that it is difficult to keep pace. Well said, Nile Gardiner, for asking if Barack Obama is the most naïve president in American history. The answer is undoubtedly yes – unless he has a secret agenda to cut America down to size. It was always in Russia that Obama threatened to do most damage and, as Nile Gardiner has rightly pointed out, these forebodings have been fulfilled. His supposed missile deal with Vladimir Putin (let’s cut straight to the organ-grinder and by-pass Medvedev, the monkey) is very satisfactory to Russian ambitions and realpolitik.
……The bottom line, however, is that it is Russia which is now in the lead in ICBM development, not America. For America voluntarily to reduce its nuclear superiority is madness. Bien-pensant talk of a nuclear-free world displays total stupidity in a global situation where nuclear weaponry is proliferating, not receding. There is even a nuclear bomb in Pakistan, which is teetering on the brink of failed statehood at the hands of Islamist insurgents. Is this a time for America to disarm, to “sell the store” as one trenchant right-wing commentator has already described Obama’s posturing in Moscow?

For Obama, success is not the delivery of watertight nuclear security for America; it is a feel-good news conference and photo opportunity that will create huge approval ratings on liberal campuses where the delusions of 1968 and the anti-Vietnam war movement still linger on in these isolated Jurassic Parks.

It seems certain Obama will sacrifice the anti-missile shield in Europe that would have been our defence against a nuclear Iran after the ayatollahs, with Russian help, emerge as potential vapourising agents of the infidel. The interceptor missiles do not even carry warheads: they rely on an impact at 14,900mph to destroy any incoming missile, so Russian hysteria about this “threat” is synthetic.

The new deal, which Obama hopes to wrap up with the Kremlin by December, creates a far more level playing field for the Russians, whose strategic conventional weapons capability is greatly outclassed by that of the Americans, and whose deteriorating nuclear weapons stockpile is aging and in decline. The whole agreement makes no sense, and is little more than a vanity exercise for Barack Obama who has ludicrously pledged to carve out a nuclear-free world.
At this rate, even Jimmy Carter looks like General Patton compared to the dove-like current U.S. president. Why cut nuclear weapons at a time when rogue regimes such as North Korea and Iran are busy building their own programmes? Does the President seriously believe this move will encourage the likes of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad or Kim Jong Il to renounce their nuclear designs? What evidence is there in history that a unilateral policy of disarmament will prompt tyrannical regimes to change their behaviour?
….the United States will have to sacrifice any plans for a ‘third site’ missile defense system in eastern and central Europe for Moscow to sign up to a news arms treaty. This would be a huge betrayal of key U.S. allies Poland and the Czech Republic. No doubt Moscow will also demand the Obama administration give the Russians a bigger say over NATO expansion eastwards, including blocking the entry of Georgia and Ukraine.
By agreeing to a grand bargain with the Medvedev/Putin regime, President Obama has unwisely opened a Pandora’s box of concessions that will only enhance Russia’s hand in its “Near Abroad”. At the same time, the Obama administration’s naïve approach will strengthen the resolve of America’s enemies such as Iran to aggressively pursue their nuclear ambitions and exploit the weakness of a president who is gravely undercutting American global power in an increasingly dangerous world.

Glenn Beck says what  I say every day as I read the news.  What is happening?  Are they all Crazy?  It simply isn’t possible for any group of people to do EVERYTHING wrong and destructive to the country by accident.  But this is what our government: President Obama, his staff and appointees and Congress are doing.  Every bill passed has been  a detriment to our economy and way of life.   This simply can not happen by accident, it has to be planned.

President Obama has been blatant in showing his hatred of America in every speech his has given in foreign nations and to foreign nations.  Now he is in Russia and  the G20 Conference in Italy.  I cringe when I think what he will do.  We know that he committed the United States to a Global Financial Agency and our Congress is now setting this up by putting everything under the oversight and control of the Federal Reserve (a private company!) that will then be easily handed over to the Global Agency.

Russia and China are calling for a global currency to replace the American dollar as the standard.    Because the Federal Reserve has already printed trillions of greatly devalued dollars to cover Obama’s debt to have the dollar then replaced by a more stable Global currency will make it impossible for the United States to pay it’s debt and our economy will collapse.   A global currency will be discussed at the G20 Conference.  We are being told this is to stop a global melt down.

some videos you may want to watch:

The Biggest Mistake America Has Ever Made: Barack Obama—Glenn Beck's 'One Thing': 06-30-09

Obama to Send 1,500 National Guard Volunteers to the Border. Problem? No Guns Allowed.

Glenn Beck: Obama to Send 1,500 National Guard Volunteers to the Border. Problem? No Guns Allowed.

Glenn Beck Interviews Ben Stein About The Cap And Trade Bill and More

Glenn Beck Interviews Ben Stein About The Cap And Trade Bill and More

new world order is the endgame, says glenn beck

new world order is the endgame, says glenn beck

In Retooled Health-Care System, Who Will Set Limits? – washingtonpost.com

The question came from a Colorado neurologist.  “Mr. President,” he said at a recent forum, “what can you do to convince the American public that there actually are limits to what we can pay for with our American health-care system? And if there are going to be limits, who . . . is going to enforce the rules for a system like that?”

President Obama called it the “right question” — then failed to answer it. This was not surprising: The query is emerging as the ultimate challenge in reining in health-care costs that now consume $2.5 trillion per year, or 16 percent of the economy. How will tough decisions be made about what to spend money on? In a country where “rationing” is a dirty word, who will say no?

“In a country where “rationing” is a dirty word, who will say no?”.  All of you who have been demanding Universal Health Care paid for by tax payers are going to be irate when  the government says no to some treatment you need, but it is becoming apparent even to our misguided Congress that rationing will take place.

Some clerk sitting in a tiny cubicle in Washington will look over your medical records that have been entered into the government data base by your doctor and decide if you are worth the treatment.  First will be your age, then your other medical conditions and over all health.  Say you’re over 65, obese, have high blood pressure and diabetes and need a rotten gall bladder removed.  No consideration will be taken of the fact that you are a mother or father and grandparent and loved by your family.  No consideration will be given to the fact that you are a regular church goer and volunteer at a local food bank.  In fact, no consideration will be given to the fact that you can possibly pay for the operation yourself.  The answer will be no because  extending your life would be a waste of funds.

What would probably be done however is not to tell you no outright but to put your name on the bottom of the list for treatment with the hope that you will die a natural death before the state has to take any action on your part.  Millions of cancer patients die annually in Canada and the European countries due to lack of timely treatment.

Although Obama and his advisers have held up providers’ spending patterns as the crux of the crisis, proposals in Washington go only so far in addressing the thorniest questions about who gets what care.

Instead, cost-saving measures are focused on introducing a public insurance option to compete with private insurers,

How having a tax payer funded “public insurance option” to compete with private insurance will cut cost is beyond me.  I am sorry but I simply can not understand what these people are thinking!  In my opinion all this tax payer funded “public insurance plan” will do is  dry up the availability of private health insurance.

or on general cuts in Medicare and Medicaid payments to hospitals.

Oh yes, this is a certainty!  The elderly and the poor will certainly fall into the category  of being “unworthy” of treatment to extend their miserable lives.  You can also add children  in this group of the unworthy because children you see are not voters!

And then there is the “back to the HMO”  advocates, but they don’t call it HMO’s  because HMO’s got a bad reputation.  The clinic of the group of doctors gets a set fee for taking care of you.  You see what ever doctor is in when you need a appointment and each doctor is well aware of the more money spent on your treatment the less money the clinic keeps and can use to pay the doctors.  Some incentive  that!

Massachusetts, which has achieved near-universal health coverage but is struggling with high costs, is considering major changes in this direction. A legislative commission is about to release a report recommending that the state goad providers into joining networks that would receive payments for each enrollee, rather than for each procedure delivered.

I have had experience with this and believe me it is bad.  The clinics are forced to take on too many patients to cover their costs and make a reasonable profit for doctors salaries so time is important and 10- 15 minutes for each patient is the top limit.  Time enough for the doctor to write a prescription of some kind but certainly not time enough to hear and evaluate symptoms to diagnose the problem.  This type of group clinics are bad for the patient and extremely  upsetting to the doctors who are not giving their best and are aware of it so there is always a big turn over of doctors.

Now that the Congress is finally debating some of the problems with Universal Health Care  Americans had better pay attention and  reevaluate their wants and needs.  BB

http://blog.cancerchoices.org/2009/07/06/post-independence-day-laments

I found this letter to be so sincere, so wishful of the America I too grew up in, and so very heartbreaking in that I feel we Americans will never know that freedom again.   As the writer says, I cry for my children and their children;  and I apologize for doing nothing over the past 30 or so years as I watched it happen and I did nothing to stop it. BB

Post Independence Day Laments

As a significant departure from my typical posts on this site, I want to share from my heart the letter that I just sent to my senators and congressman in Washington.  It is related to cancer treatment in that we will never see a new strategy for the war on cancer until Washington experiences a fundamental re-engineering in values and policy.

Dear Senator,

This Independence Day holiday has been different from any of the other 62 that I have celebrated.  As I was growing up, July 4th was associated with fireworks and fun.  In my young adult years, my zeal for my country as a young officer in the Air Force made the occasion extra special.  During 24 years of serving my country, I became more of a realist from a broader perspective and recommitted myself to strengthening this great nation on each Fourth.  Watching our decline in morals, influence, and prosperity over the last 20 years has led me each year to promise to pray more and resolve to work harder for a return to what we as a people were meant to be.  I refused to lose my confidence in our leaders and my faith in the resilience of our citizens regardless of the challenges we faced internationally and domestically.

With great sadness and regret, I have to tell you that this Independence Day was different.  I marveled again at the fireworks, enjoyed friends at a picnic, honored fellow veterans at a local memorial, and worshipped God with a patriotic flair.  But, it wasn’t with the same pride and confidence as in the past.  For the first time in my life, I must say that I am still proud of my country, but not of my government.  The problem is, I’m not sure the two can be separated.  As the government goes, so goes the country.

In a matter of a few months, the decline of this nation has become a precipitous freefall.  We are spending more than we will ever be able to recover from; the federal government has virtually taken over our financial institutions, many of our major manufacturing corporations, our energy industry, and is making a run on our entire healthcare system; and the future of the dollar has become an international joke.  Much of our judicial system is a sham.  Our reputation as a super power is at a century low as we cower to rogue nations and extremists that threaten and insult us while we legitimize them with “diplomacy.”  Our president has declared that we are no longer a Christian nation and has apologized for our history.  He has promoted abortion, placated the homosexual community, increased the size and authority of the federal government, and set the stage for a socialist society.  How can I really celebrate the greatest and most compassionate nation in the history of mankind when I see it in swift decline fiscally, socially, and morally?

My concern is not for myself and my generation.  My generation has experienced what I believe is the best that

America has ever had to offer.  Historians will probably characterize us baby boomers as the most blessed of all generations.  My worry is for my children, grandchildren, and further progeny who will probably never get to enjoy what I have experienced.  Cliché as it may sound, their future is in our hands.  In larger measure, their future is in YOUR hands.

You, Senator, with your colleagues can do a lot to reverse the fate of

America.  Congress can start by stopping the insane spending NOW.  You can cast votes in the direction of restoring our free enterprise.  You can demand smaller government and a rational tax system.  You can stand up to the President and vote consistently against his socialistic maneuvering.  You can speak out loud and clear against the moral decay that is crippling us and enact legislation that will reverse the laws that enable that decay.  I’m not blaming you for all the troubles we face, but I am asking you to lead like never before in doing everything you can to take us back to the nation our forefathers under God’s hand gave us.  You are in office during the most critical time in our history.  Rise above politics.  Do the right things.  Lead!

Terry Thompson

Hot Springs, Arkansas

This entry was posted on Monday, July 6th, 2009 at 04:03 and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Dumbing-Down the U.S. Navy by breaking the law

Posted by: brendabowers on: July 7, 2009

Pat Buchanan : Dumbing-Down the U.S. Navy – Townhall.com

The Naval Academy is following the path our schools, colleges and universities have been going down for decades now.

“Of the 1,230 plebes who took the oath of office at the Naval Academy in Annapolis this week, 435 were members of minority groups. It’s the most racially diverse class in the nation’s 164-year history. Academy leaders say it’s a top priority to build a student body that reflects the racial makeup of the Navy and the nation.”

How did this “diversity”  happen?

white applicants must have all As and Bs and test scores of at least 600 on the English and math parts of the SAT even to qualify for a “slate” of 10 applicants, from which only one will be chosen.However, if you check a box indicating you are African-American, Hispanic, Native American or Asian, writes Fleming, “SAT scores to the mid 500s with quite a few Cs in classes … typically produces a vote of ‘qualified’ … with direct admission to Annapolis. They’re in and given a pro forma nomination to make it legit.”

If true, the U.S. Naval Academy is running a two-tier admissions system of the kind that kept Jennifer Gratz out of the University of Michigan and was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court.

“Minority applicants with scores and grades down to the 300s and Cs and Ds also come, though after a year at our taxpayer-supported remedial school, the Naval Academy Preparatory School.”

this is a national disgrace. It would represent a U.S. Naval Academy policy of systematic race discrimination, every year, against hundreds of white kids who worked and studied their entire lives for the honor of being appointed to the U.S. Naval Academy and becoming career officers in the Navy or Marine Corps.

It is hoped some of  the white students who were barred from attending the Academy will follow in the footsteps of the New Jersey Firefighters and bring this practice to light.  It is time to stop the quota system!  It is time to make a diploma worth the paper it is printed on no matter how the chips fall out as far as race is concerned.  BB


Priscilla’s Let’s Pretend Girls Shop (Brenda’s eBay store)

http://PriscillasLetsPretend.com

Categories

Archives

 

July 2009
M T W T F S S
« Jun    
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031