Does taking over the top spot on a House committee lead to a financial windfall for lawmakers? A new report suggests it does.
Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), looking at 10 separate House panels, found that the top Republican and Democrat had seen their fundraising totals from the industries they oversee grow at a steep rate between the 1998 election cycle and the 2010 cycle.
In all, CREW found, these chairmen and ranking members saw their industry contributions jump almost sixfold while their fundraising in general rose 230 percent.
The good-government group, which used data from the Center for Responsive Politics, suggested that its findings essentially show that industries are legally bribing top lawmakers.
“Congress would be a lot more transparent if it just put a for sale sign on the front of the Capitol,” Melanie Sloan, CREW’s executive director, said in a statement.
CREW found, among other things, that financial industry donations to Rep. Spencer Bachus (R-Ala.), the House Financial Services chairman, rose by 620 percent between 1998 and 2010 – more than two and a half times the jump in his total contributions.
Rep. Collin Peterson of Minnesota, the ranking Democrat on the Agriculture panel, saw a similar increase — a 711 percent jump in donations from agriculture groups, compared to a 274 percent upswing overall.
Reps. Barney Frank (D-Mass.), the ranking member at Financial Services, and Fred Upton (R-Mich.), the chairman at the Energy and Commerce Committee, also saw significant increases in industry donations.
CREW also said that their research found that committee leaders were sometimes more likely to vote in an industry’s favor than colleagues from the same party.
But the group’s findings were also not across-the-board.
Peterson, for instance, voted 7 out of 10 times with industries regulated by the Agriculture Committee in 2007 and 2008, the same exact percentage as the average Democrat.
Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Calif.), now the ranking member at Energy and Commerce, also got more than 10 times as much from related industries in 2010 than he did in 1998. But Waxman’s overall fundraising grew by a factor of 11.
And Rep. Edward Markey of Massachusetts, now the top Democrat at Natural Resources, saw his industry contributions jump by more than 2,500 percent in the dozen years examined.
Still, the $47,400 Markey received from industry groups in the 2010 cycle amounted to just over 3 percent of his total contributions. The Massachusetts Democrat had brought in $1,800 from those groups in 1998.
Supreme Court takes up Obamacare—sort of.
November 14, 2011 by Brenda Bowers
The supreme Court announced at about 10 am this morning that they were taking up the question of whether or not those who brought suit against Obamacare had the right to do so. Yes, you read correctly! They have not agreed to consider whether or not Obamacare is constitutionally lawful but only if the people who dared to say it wasn’t and take the federal government to court over what they considered an illegality had the right to do so.
This seems to mean that if they rule that the people who sued had a right to sue then they would go on and rule on the legality of the personal mandate (forcing Americans to buy health insurance or any other product) in Obamacare. If the judges rule that these people had the right to sue then they may choose to go on and rule on the suits and the constitutionality of Obamacare. And because of the Democrats in Congress failed to take time to state that one portion of the bill can be ruled unconstitutional but the rest of the bill would stand then the entire bill and all of its monsterous and hateful and nation destroying mandates will fall.
If the Justices rule that the people who sued had no right to sue then the whole thing has to start over again with the “proper” people doing the suing. This means Obamacare and its cancerous growth throughout our government has that many more years to overtake and overwhelm.
Bottom line: it is time to pray people that the 4 sane Justices plus Justice Kennedy (we hope) prevail against the Obama appointees on the court. BB
Posted in American Crash 2011, Barack Obama, Commentary, Constitution of the United States of America, Economy/Money, Know the enemies of America, Obama and ethics, Obamacare, Obamanation, Progressives Movement to Destroy America, Radical Left at War with America, Supreme Court, Supreme Court rulings | Tagged Supreme Court 2011, Supreme Court and health care bill 2011, Supreme Court and Obamacare, Supreme Court on, supreme Court on the Obamacare individual mandate | Leave a Comment »