More Palestinian Muslims who are possible terrorist or have ties to terrorist to be resettled in the United States. I wonder why this is necessary? Of course I know the answer to this: because President Obama has informed the world that the United States is not a Christian nation, but it is a Muslim nation. And of course we owe so much of our culture to the Muslims according to President Obama and his stooges in the White House who are pandering to the Islamic Society of North America. The ISNA had their convention in Washington DC this past weekend and were taped selling anti-American and jihad books and materials. As if this wasn’t bad enough one of Obama’s appointed stooges was a featured speaker.
The U.S. State Department said on Tuesday it will grant asylum to 1,350 Arabs in Iraq who claim to have the right to live in Israel based on ancestry. The unprecedented numbers to be allowed to resettle in the United States may anger Israel, the Christian Science Monitor (CSM) reported.
Most of them lived well in Iraq under former dictator Saddam Hussein but then were thrown out of their homes after his downfall. They were targeted since the American invasion of the country and have been living near the border with Syria.
These people were targeted by Iraqis not Americans. The Iraqis as well as most Arab states don’t want anything to do with these people. Why is that? could it be that after 60 years and three or more generations of being brainwashed and made into haters and killers they are seen as trouble makers by other Arab Muslims? But our current administration do not see them in the same light.
The Bush administration rarely accepted Arabs defined as “Palestinian refugees” in order not to irritate Israel, one diplomat told CSM. He said the Arabs will be processed as refugees from Iraq. Todd Pierce, a spokesman for the State Department’s Bureau of Population, Refugees and Migration, said that the Arabs in Iraq are not being equated with those from Judea, Samaria and Gaza.
The Bush administration rarely accepted Arabs defined as Palestinian refugees for the same reason all the Arab nations refuse to have them in their countries!! Why are they not just resettled in Muslim nations?
Jordan is the only Arab country that grants citizenship to Arabs who claim ancestry in Israel but has not allowed Arabs to enter from Iraq, according to Mark Krikorian, director of the Center for Immigration Studies in Washington.
The latest issue for the Palestinians is to demand that all Palestinians who had at least one ancestor who had lived in what is now Israel must be allowed to return to Israel. This is patently against the internationally accepted definition of a refugee. Only the original person having left or been forced out of a country is a refugees, whereas future generations are not. This new twist is being held up now as a ploy to keep the Israeli/Palestinian issue on the burner. The Palestinians and Arab states do not wish to settle the problem.
A spokesman for the Foreign Ministry told Israel National News that it would not comment on the new American policy. Granting asylum to the Arabs could be interpreted by the Palestinian Authority as official United States acceptance of them as Arabs with a right to live in Israel but who were granted special status because of the American war.
……. the issue a “hot potato” and that the State Department announcement is “tossing their problems over their head into Harrisburg, Pennsylvania or Omaha, Nebraska” and making America “a dumping ground” for its problems. Most of the Iraqi Arabs will be settled in southern California.
So most of these Iraqi Arab Muslims will be settle in southern California? LOL this is just dandy. Muslims hate gays and California is the gay capitol of the United States. Oh well…..
very true. But as it goes noting B.Hussain deos is bad. so Lets all be happy and welcome the Osama wana-beesssss.
and please , pleasse , and more please let us not offend any one.
thanks
This is classic idiot behavior. Or is it all part of a master plan to social engineer some utopian vision in Obama’s head. I predict if this plan is carried out car bombs in Southern California will be commonplace in the near future. I know, “So. Cal?!! How about the entire nation?” It’ll start in LA and quickly spread. It must be nice to wear Obama’s rose-colored glasses. Seeing a world where “I’m sorry” makes everything better and where if I put my gun down the bad guys will follow my good example.
I don’t believe Obama has a Utopian vision at all. I think he knows exactly what he wants and that is chaos to bring the United States down. and to keep us occupied with internal turmoil while he sells us out to the United Nations.
He wants to take away the guns from the good guys so the bad guys have it easy. I am reading reports of how FEMA is being set up to take over the population using the military after the Attorney General or even on of the Obama appointed czars calls for martial law. Need more information on this. BB
Hyperinflation is coming and with it food shortages. As we cut back our capacity to make anything or produce enough food (outsourcing everything to 3rd world and our political enemies) we set the stage for future civil unrest. While I am never certain if I should believe reports from survivalists and other end-of-the-world types, I wouldn’t be surprised if the government has seen this coming and feels incapable of stopping it. Perhaps there is some truth to the FEMA story.
The paranoid side of me wonders if they want it to happen so the world will be a more fair place where the high are brought low and the low are elevated. That is the basis of my Obama “Utopian” vision. I recall hearing an interview with Bill Clinton around 1997 where he commented that to raise the stand of living in the 3rd world our SOL would likely have to come down a bit. I think the Big O is trying to make this a reality. In any event we have witnessed the stripping of American Industrial power beginning in the early 90s and continuing now. I believe D’s see the world as more fair when suffering is spread around – as long as they hold onto power, with all that implies. I think R’s went along with this lie called free-trade because they saw it as a chance to lower prices while increasing profits.
No thought seems to have gone into the job losses, reduced capacity, or increased foreign dependence that would result long-term. No one thinks long-term in this nation. I think some believed new technologies would replace the displaced jobs. To some extend they were right but my 1991 contention was the theory isn’t sustainable and would ultimately result in a lower standard of living here, the creation of a slave culture abroad, and finally the collapse of the government due to a diminished tax base and overwhelming federal debt. I told my college macro economics professor this, as it was all beginning and he thought Free Trade a win-win with no end.
I disagree, everything ends. You cannot send industries away and replace them with low paid Walmart jobs, increase government spending, continue to create new entitlements, and not face a crisis. More unemployed and lower wages mean less people paying taxes, that means more taxes on those “d*mn rich b*st*rds”. More taxes on businesses mean more layoffs, outsourcing, and lower wages. The result? Higher unemployment and fewer taxpayers and more entitlement payouts. That creates higher federal debt, increased taxes on businesses and the cycle goes on. Meanwhile the other cycle of outsourcing (I have written about on my blog) is going on and the two cycles feed each other very slowly. These things don’t happen in 6 months but over decades. This really started in the 1970s and perhaps one could argue it was the 1950s when W.E. Deming took TQM to Japan after American companies rejected him.
Anyway that was a digression and a rant. I apologize (but take none of it back.)
LOL I love your digressions! So often so much more is learned from digressions and I guess my students knew that too.
I agree with all you have said and it is also my thinking. And yes this has been going on for a long time. It really began, if you care to go back there, with WWI and our coming away from our isolationist mindset. Then Wilson was our first One World Government President. The United States thank goodness did not go along with his League of Nations nonsense.
Then we had that all important crisis that allows change: the Great Depression followed by WWII and then the United Nations. I believe those who voted for the United Nations actually believed the United States would be the most influential member—stupid! We have one vote and then turned around and allowed Russia on the Security Council against all logic, which then demanded the formation of NATO to counteract the UN Security Council with Russia’s Veto.
Reagen tried to pull us back away form too much UN involvement and tried to get reforms. He also withheld our funding which is of course the lions share demanding the corruption be at least investigated. Clinton was a advocate of the UN. Bush simply paid lip service and then tried to ignore the UN.. Now Obama wants a One World Government and the first step is to nationalize or otherwise get into his own hands as much of our economy and national security as possible so as to hand it over to the United Nations. This is not however the final step because The UN will be the “legislative branch of the new world order and Obama is looking to be the Executive Branch.
He has sent to the Senate Foreign Relation Committee 17 treaties he wants pushed thru and ratified. The Law of the Sea is one that right now seems the biggest grab for power, but I need to study the others more closely.
(Sigh) Sometimes I get so discouraged and upset when i talk to people and they have no idea what is happening and don’t care. Then I see the Tea Party Rallies and have hope. BB
Thank you for your reply. There must be more thinkers that think the right thoughts and see evil as is: evil and not afraid to point it out. Don’t be discouraged and upset for those that agnore the truth will be in bondage. keep pointing and telling for the biggest crime is saying nothing.
thanks
wdednh, Thank you. I can’t seem to stop trying to get thru to people and the only way I have to do it is thru my blog. Some days, most days in fact any more, I am so depressed by the news of what is happening that I swear I am going to take my retirement seriously and just go paint a pretty picture. I can paint for hours on end and the time just flies and I am happy. But the next day I am compelled to get back on my computer! (sigh) Oh well, a fool is born every minute and one was born when I was born.
BB