Archive for the ‘Catholic Left-Wing Radicals’ Category
>> SHOCKING REPORT: Rand Corp Tells US Army Its Time For a National Stability Police Force
Posted on: January 15, 2010
People you simply must read this post. I told the blog author I was bringing it home to my readers but please do go to his site and read all he has to say. Thank you to Yid with Lid Yid With Lid Conservative blogger
It seems that every time I begin to hope maybe things can not get much worse I read about one more act of treason, or promotion of treason. Evil surely has found a toe hold in the United States, but we Americans are made up of the best gene pools from all over the world as all of us, but the Native Americans, come from immigrants to this country. Immigrants are the best, the brightest and the toughest because that is what it takes to tear up ones roots and move to a new land. That being said, Americans are great enough to do what ever needs done to preserve our way of life and fight off any threat to our freedoms once we have recognized that threat.
You will find the entire report on embedded this site as well as the authors commentary. BB
Our analysis clearly indicates that the United States needs an SPF or some other way to accomplish the SPF mission. Stability operations have become an inescapable reality of U.S. foreign policy. Establishing security with soldiers and police is critical because it is difficult to achieve other objectives—such as rebuilding political and economic systems—without it.
The cost of not fixing this gap is significant. The United States will continue to experience major challenges in stability operations if it does not have this policing capacity. These challenges include creating the ability to establish basic law and order, as well as defeat or deter criminal organizations, terrorists, and insurgents. In some cases, allied countries may be able to fill this gap. Allies did this effectively in Bosnia and Kosovo, both of which were successful in establishing security. In other cases, the United States may not be able to count on allied support. The United States should not depend on allies to supply these capabilities, because doing so would limit U.S. freedom of action on the international stage. Consequently, the United States should seriously consider building a high-end police capacity.
• Jul. 6, 2007 – Some Groups of Criminals Wear Teflon Coatings
Posted in Commentary
There were two articles in yesterday’s News & Record that just keep worrying at the back of my mind. One was a commentary by Thomas Friedman about the Muslims and how as a group they have yet to condemn the terrorists attacks. Terrorists attacks where all have been carried out by Muslims. Muslim leaders continue to say that Islam is a religion of peace, and as a group the least thing said or written about Muslims where no one is harmed or killed and the people are called out by their Imams to riot in the streets. But, never have they once even whispered a note of sorrow when young Muslim men carry out the deeds that their religion’s writings, text books and leaders call upon them to do.
And, if this is not bad enough the world in general does not condemn them. Not once has there been an edict from the United Nations condemning Muslims as a group for fostering and encouraging these atrocities. Our own government refuses to acknowledge that Muslims are the world’s terrorist. Security checks at air ports continue to pat down little old ladies walking with canes as possible terrorists! It is as if Muslims as a group and Muslims terrorists are coated with Teflon because anything they do that is wrong simply slides off and is somehow forgotten or forgiven. Because of course, Islam is a religion of peace.
The other article was about the Black Caucus in North Carolina state government and their highly unethical practice of giving scholarship funds to the children and relatives of members of their own group. These people solicit funds for scholarships leading the donors to believe they will go to needy students and then skim off funds for their own children who surely are not needy if their parent is a state politician. And no one in the Black community sees anything wrong with what they are doing. In fact Blacks who do speak up speak up for the culprits, and refuse to acknowledge that the behavior is unethical. This same attitude is seen every time a Black who wears a business suit is caught with their hand in the cookie jar. (Blacks who wear jeans and tee shirts are fair game however and arrested all the time for far lesser crimes!)
Diane Bellamy-Small’s behavior and violations of trust she has as a city council person and demands for special treatment she feels due her as a city council member not only went unpunished but her supporters were even permitted to viciously harangue City Council woman Florence Gotten because she dared to ask for Bellamy-Small’s resignation. And the Black Pulpit Forum, a group of ministers no less, defended her unethical and perhaps unlawful behavior.
I could go on and on with examples from all over the country where Blacks are supported by the Black community even after they have been proven guilty. They can be caught with bribe money of $90,000 in their freezer and still continue to sit in the US House, they can be video taped using drugs guilty beyond a doubt and still be re-elected Mayor of our nations capital while in prison, and they can even get away with murder.
American Blacks are coated with Teflon too. The name of their Teflon coat is the cry of “racist”. All they have to do is utter the word and White government officials cave in. In the case of the Black Caucus Scholarship unethical behavior the Chair lady, our own Alma Adams, is the one using the R word, the Teflon word.
Now tell me just how do these two groups of people differ? Oh, I realize that one group commits horrendous crimes against humans while the other is just thievery but really, how do they differ in their attitudes towards members of their group’s criminal behavior? BB
• Dec. 6, 2007 – The Problem with Good Fundamentalist
Posted in Commentary
Leonard Pitts is a fine commentator whom I used to read faithfully and now only browse because I think he has gone over the line on racists issues. I can remember and pin point exactly when this happened. It happened when Pitt’s son came home and told about an incident where he was questioned for what he and his father felt was simply because he was a Black.
Pitts lost his perspective then and became a racist. I can understand his outrage as a father at this particular White person, but I can not excuse his turning what had been a sane and Pulitzer winning commentator into raving racist. It is sad.
The incident with his son should not have happened, but given the extreme crime rate among young Black men neither could the clerk at the store be wholly blamed either. Both Pitts, his son and the White clerk are unfortunate victims of the overall degeneration of the lower class Black society. And whereas some Blacks are acknowledging this and admitting that we as a nation have a real problem and the problem lies with the Blacks and is a Black problem to fix . This is so because the White population has done all it can to provide opportunities for all people to rise out of poverty and can do no more if the people themselves refuse to take the opportunities. As proof I offer the stats that tell us Whites are on welfare an average of 18 months and then never to return. Blacks on the other hand average 3 and one half years on welfare. Many families both Black and White are multigenerational welfare recipients. But here again it is by far a Black issue that is growing daily unchecked as children have children who in turn have children and none of whom finish school or make any effort to get out of poverty or even to allow themselves to be dragged kicking and screaming out of poverty. When the welfare rolls were reduced to try a bit of tough love in getting these people off the welfare rolls they simply turned to crime as their means of support rather than the government dole. Go back and check the spike in crime rates as compared to states efforts to reduce the welfare roles if you doubt me. The facts are all at your fingertips if you are reading this blog.
Anyhow Pitts had a fairly good article today where he condemned fundamentalists of all religions. His lead in to the story was the incident of the teacher whose class named a teddy bear Mohammed which is as common in Muslim countries as Joe in our society and the fundamentalist want her stoned for this “sacrilege’. Then Pitts went on to make his point that fundamentalist of all religions are wrong. Doug Clark whom I do read and enjoy and even like as a journalist and as a human being took umbrage at this and defended fundamentalists on his blog today. In fact, he totally missed the point of Pitts article and I imagine he was not alone.
So, my comment: I agree with what you are saying Doug. People can be fundamentalist of their chosen religion and not be ready to kill anyone who does not believe as they do. But! And this is a huge and extremely important BUT. It is when the majority of the fundamentalist sit back and say nothing or do nothing when the extremists of their faith will do anything to see that the world in general conforms to the dictates of that faith who are the culprits. The silent ones who accept and by their silence condone the actions of few who will kill and lie and hate in order to see their views are the ones that prevail not just in their group but by all peoples all over the world. These are the fundamentalist we must fear and the ones I believe Pitts is speaking of in his piece today.
A stupid cartoon raise the ire of Muslims around the globe who rioted in the streets (thank goodness in their own cities!) and put out contracts to kill the journalists who dare to print these cartoons, but who sat mute when 3000 innocent people were killed when Muslim fundamentalists flew an air plane into the World Trade Center. Or worse, much much worse, these quiet fundamentalists who sit silent when children in their own cities are burned alive by hate filled fundamentalist suicide bombers. These are the fundamentalist Pitts was speaking of as I read his article, and these are indeed the fundamentalist of all faiths whom we should all condemn and fear. BB

Recent Comments