Archive for the ‘Financial Industry Reform’ Category
Senate Democrats still determined to destroy the United States under burden of debt.
Posted on: March 12, 2013
- In: Communism in America | Deficit Reduction Proposal | Economy/Money | Financial Industry Reform | Health Care Reform Summary | Ineffective Government Programs | Iran and Nuclear weapons | Know the enemies of America | Obama's moratorium on drilling in the Gulf | Obamcare repeal and replace | Redistributing wealth | Unfunded liabilities
- Leave a Comment
The budgets from the Republican House (Ryan budget), the Democrats in the Senate and Obama won’t pass so the country will again for the fourth year continue to operate on “continuing resolutions”. The law of the country requires that Congress pass a budget but for 4 years the Senate has refused to even offer up a budget let alone pass the one offered by either the President (NOT ONE VOTE FOR ANT OBAMA BUDGET EVEN FROM A DEMOCRAT!) or the budget offered by and passed by the Republicans in the House.
Sooooo, here we have the Senate Democrats ”continuing resolution” and if all the tears hadn’t been rung out of me in November when We the People re-elected Obama to the Presidency then I would probably find myself crying again. Surely not all of these people are evil and certainly they are not all stupid, so what in the world is happening in the Democrat Senators minds?!?
The following article from The Heritage Foundation explains very well some of the more egregious proposed spending. I hope when you read this you get on the hone to your Congressman or woman be he/she Democrat or Republican and demand some sanity in Washington. BB
Heritage Experts’ Reaction to Senate Continuing Resolution
March 12, 2013 at 5:40 pm
Newscom
The massive spending bill, or continuing resolution, released by the Senate this week continues spending on programs which are inappropriate or wasteful and fails to adopt good policies in many areas. Here’s a rundown of some of the worst offenders in the Senate bill:
Obamacare. The CR fails to stop the massive spending in Obamacare. Obamacare obligates an estimated $1.2 trillion for subsidies to individuals for purchasing coverage through the government exchanges and $638 billion for states agreeing to expand their Medicaid programs. Congress should eliminate the exchange subsidies and the enhanced federal match for the Medicaid expansion. Stopping these provisions would save the federal government more than $1.8 trillion over the next 10 years. Nor does it take steps to defund implementation of Obamacare.
(Already the regulations governing how Obamacare is implemented is 7 feet tall and only about 1/40 of the bill is covered by these regulations. Just the application to qualify for Obamacare is 15 pages long! BB)
—Nina Owcharenko, Director, Center for Health Policy Studies and Preston A. Wells, Jr. Fellow
Inadequate Defense Funding Levels. The detailed defense appropriations provisions in the House-adopted appropriations bill (H.R. 933), and now its Senate companion legislation, provide inadequate overall funding levels for defense, in part because they will continue to apply the reduction in defense spending for the current fiscal year required by sequestration. Nevertheless, the defense provisions continue wasteful spending practices. These defense appropriations provisions were agreed to by House and Senate appropriators earlier, and therefore the wasteful practices were also preserved in the Senate version of the same legislation.
The Heritage Foundation has identified at least $70 billion in annual savings within the Department of Defense through a combination of military health care and retirement reform, hiring freezes, expanding performance-based logistics, and reforming the acquisition process.
Clearly, this is money that could be kept within the defense budget and put into more militarily useful programs, such as improving space technology for use in missile defense or developing new classes of nuclear weapons delivery systems. The more productive approach to funding an effective military posture for the U.S. would be for Congress to return to the regular budgetary order, set aside sequestration, adopt higher defense appropriations that are applied in a more disciplined fashion and look to restrain federal spending growth in the areas of foreign aid, domestic discretionary programs, and entitlements.
(The world has never been so dangerous as it is today. Iran is on the verge of getting nuclear weapons and working very aggressively on their missile delivery program. North Korea already has nuclear weapons and now may very well have a missile able to hit the West Coast. So what does the President and the Democrats want to do? cut our defense programs! BB)
—Baker Spring, F.M. Kirby Research Fellow in National Security Policy
Head Start. Increasing Head Start funding is the antithesis of good early childhood education policy. The Senate CR provides $33.5 million in new funding for one of the most ineffective federal education programs in existence today: Head Start. While the new funding is earmarked for the Obama Administration’s plan to make the worst-performing Head Start centers re-compete for funds, it represents new spending on a program the federal government has deemed totally ineffective at meeting the needs of poor children.
In December, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) released itslong-overdue evaluation of Head Start. The agency’s scientifically rigorous evaluation of more than 5,000 Head Start children from the time they entered the program through third grade revealed that the $8 billion per year federal program had little to no impact on cognitive, social-emotional, health, or parenting practices of participants. On a few measures, access to Head Start had negative effects on children.
In addition to the evidence presented by HHS of Head Start’s ineffectiveness, in 2010 the Government Accountability Office (GAO) reported widespread fraud at Head Start centers. GAO sent undercover investigators into Head Start centers in various states, and in half they found fraudulent activity, such as Head Start employees counseling families to underreport their income in order to appear eligible for services.
Since 1965, taxpayers have expended some $180 billion on Head Start yet have not received a return on that “investment.” And now, in the wake of an objective report by HHS demonstrating that Head Start is failing the poor children it was designed to serve, the Senate CR would increase spending and eschew any suggestion of eliminating or reforming the Great Society relic.
Head Start should be eliminated. At a minimum, it should be reformed to allow states to make their Head Start dollars portable, following low-income children to a private preschool provider of choice, instead of relegating them to underperforming Head Start centers.
—Lindsey Burke, Will Skillman Fellow in Education
Energy. The Senate CR continues to fund a failed energy policy that empowers Washington bureaucrats instead of American families and businesses. Though it does cut some programs minimally, it does the equivalent of removing a used napkin from a full trash can. There’s much more waste that needs to be removed. For example, section 1203 reduces Department of Energy (DOE) funding by $44 million when more than $5.3 billion could be cut. The $44 million is equivalent to 0.8 percent of what should be cut.
Perhaps most egregious is the meager $11 million cut from the $1.8 billion request for Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. In total, the DOE budget funds applied-research programs on conventional fuels, renewable energy sources, and nuclear energy that the private sector should be undertaking. American families and business are far better equipped than government to determine what types of energy technologies work for them. Eliminating these programs alone would save $3 billion in taxpayer money and help to return energy choice back to Americans.
Though the bill cuts $10 million from nuclear energy spending, based on the 2013 request, it would still fund over $150 million for nuclear waste disposal and management programs. None of this funding would go toward Yucca Mountain, the waste repository mandated by the Nuclear Waste Policy Act, as amended. Given the complete lack of any nuclear waste disposal or management policy by the Administration and its insistence on terminating the Yucca project, there is little justification for this spending. Instead, Congress should provide $40 million for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to finish its review of the DOE’s Yucca Mountain permit application.
(The United States sits on the largest pool of CLEAN natural gas in the world and we have the means to get to this energy source but it does not fall into the category of solar, wind or water. natural gas is a fossil fuel! BAD!!! The United States also has the largest pool of oil available within our borders. Obama likes to say that we are pumping more oil today than at any time in our history. this is true but it is BEING PUMPED OFF OF PRIVATE PROPERTY AND NOT FROM GOVERNMENT OWNED LANDS. AND THE GOVERNMENT IS BUYING UP PROPERTY LIKE NEVER BEFORE TO PUT MORE LAND UNDER IT’S CONTROL! bb)
—Jack Spencer, Senior Research Fellow, Nuclear Energy, and Nick Loris, Herbert and Joyce Morgan Fellow
Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC). Unlike the budget passed by the House, the Senate bill seeks to restore government spending to fund the failed CPSC product safety database. CPSC decision making with respect to the database has previously been called “arbitrary and capricious” by the courts.
Since it was implemented in 2011, manufacturers have shown that the CPSC database is seriously flawed. The database allows the public to submit unproven claims of harm with the CPSC and gives manufacturers only 10 days to challenge these claims; however, the CPSC itself has final authority to publish reports of such claims, even if they are disproved by the manufacturer. The accuracy of the CPSC reports is thus seriously questionable, and is a one-stop shop for tort lawyers seeking new clients or seeking “evidence” for their current lawsuits.
Furthermore, last October, in Company Doe v. Inez Tenenbaum, a federal court in Maryland overturned a decision of the CPSC to publish a report as “arbitrary and capricious,” because the CPSC report was “misleading and fail[ed] to relate[] to the [manufacturer’s] product in any way.” Indeed, the CPSC database is a concrete example of government waste: It is a shame that the Senate bill seeks to restore government spending to publishing misleading claims that damage business growth and likely lead to additional frivolous lawsuits.
(What this means for you and me is that companies will refuse to put new products on the market that may save a life! BB)
—Andrew Kloster, Legal Fellow
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP): $77.2 billion. The recommendation continues record-high food stamp benefits. Food stamp spending has approximately doubled since President Obama came to office. It is one of the largest and fastest growing federal welfare programs. The federal government operates 80 federal welfare programs at a cost of nearly $1 trillion a year. Over 10 of these provide food assistance.
Food stamp spending should be rolled back to pre-recession levels. Able-bodied adults without dependents who receive food stamp benefits should be required to work or prepare for work as a condition of receiving benefits.
—Rachel Sheffield, Research Associate
Job Corps: $30 million added to the funding level already provided under sequestration. This program should be terminated, because a scientifically rigorous impact evaluation of Job Corps participants were less likely to obtain high school degrees, were no more likely to attend or complete college, and earned only $0.22 more in hourly wages than non-participants. Further, the Department of Labor Office of Inspector General estimates each Job Corps participant who is successfully placed into any job costs taxpayers $76,574. (Why don’t we just give every one who applies for one of these job training programs $20,000. and send them home to sit on their asses for another 6 months? This would be a whole lot cheaper in the long run! BB)
Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) grants: $416.5 million. VAWA grantsshould be terminated, because these services should be funded locally. Using federal agencies to fund the routine operations of domestic violence programs that state and local governments could provide is a misuse of federal resources and a distraction from concerns that are truly the province of the federal government.
(This one just makes me cringe and cry and be sick! BB)
Office of Justice Programs (OJP) grants: $1.1 billion. OJP grants should be terminated, because these grants assign functions to the federal government that fall within the expertise, jurisdiction, and constitutional responsibilities of state and local governments. Further, the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grants ($392 million) within OJP have been used to place criminals on the street without posting bail.
Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP): $279.5 million. OJJDP grants should be terminated, because these grants fund juvenile justice and prevention programs that fall under the unique responsibilities of state and local governments. Further, there is little evidence that these grants are effective at preventing delinquency.
Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS): $225.5 million. COPS grantsshould be terminated, because these grants assign functions to the federal government that fall within the expertise, jurisdiction, and constitutional responsibilities of state and local governments. Further COPS grants were used tosupplant local funds and had little to no effect on reducing crime.
FEMA Fire Grants: $675 million. Fire grants should be terminated. Fire grants, which subsidize the routine operations of local fire departments, are ineffective at reducing fire-related deaths and injuries of firefighters and civilians. Fire grants incorrectly encourage local fire departments to become increasingly dependent on federal funding.
—David B. Muhlhausen, Ph.D., Research Fellow in Empirical Policy Analysis
Postal Service Saturday delivery: $2 billion. The Senate CR continues—by omission—the prior year’s ban on using the Postal Service’s small appropriation to reduce service levels, effectively mandating Saturday service. This, along with other such congressional restriction, limits the Postal Service’s ability to reduce costs and increases the risk of massive federal subsidies in the near future. (Yes, the Post Master CAN NOT make decisions that would make the Post Office more efficient because of Congress! BB)
—James Gattuso, Senior Research Fellow in Regulatory Policy
NASA Manned Spacecraft: $1.2 billion. The Orion Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle is the new manned spacecraft NASA is developing for exploration of the Moon and Mars and for other purposes. Manned space flight is vastly more expensive than robotic exploration and is largely a public relations showcase for NASA to market itself to the American people. NASA’s budget should be pared back to a tight focus on cost-effective projects to advance its core missions.
(This is one I disagree with. The United States and Americans have benefited much from inventions made and perfected by the space program. I won’t go into the many, many inventions because you can google them for yourself. The space program should not be cut. And, another reason is the brain drain because these NASA scientists needing jobs will go to Russia, china and other countries; do we really want this? BB )
—J. D. Foster, Norman B. Ture Senior Fellow in the Economics of Fiscal Policy
National Science Foundation (NSF): $221 million. The bill would increase funding for NSF by $221 million, compared to the fiscal year (FY) 2012 enacted level, putting the total funding amount to $7.25 billion. Yet NSF has spent large amounts on research projects that are clearly not federal priorities ($325,000 for a “Robosquirrel” study; $516,000 creating a video game simulating prom week; and $350,000 for a study on how golfers should imagine a bigger hole when playing). Basic research is important, but given that NSF funding is diverted to inappropriate projects, it becomes wasteful. Budget reductions may help encourage more prudence.
National Institutes of Health (NIH): $71 million. Some of NIH’s funding goes to projects that seem inappropriate, such as $550,000 to acquire evidence that heavy drinking in a person’s 30s can lead to feelings of immaturity, while in their 20s it would not.
Legal Services Corporation (LSC): $358 million. This program should be terminated, because these services should be funded locally. The money is oftendiverted instead of going to poor people needing legal services, and there is a long history of waste and abuse of these funds by executives at the LSC.
Transportation. The bill would increase funding for highway programs and transit formula grants to match the levels authorized in Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century (MAP-21), current surface transportation law. It also funds a $4 million Transit Safety office that was authorized in MAP-21. By funding this new office and the transit formula grants, the bill would continue diversions of limited Highway Trust Fund (HTF) user fees to transit, which is a demonstrated local—not a federal—priority.
Transit serves truly local needs and is predominantly concentrated in just six cities.Congress should end such diversions from the HTF, because they come at the expense of highway and bridge maintenance and expansion projects and do not demonstrably improve mobility and safety.
—Emily Goff, Research Associate
Housing and Urban Development Public Operating Fund: $562 million. The bill restores money from an FY 2012 cut to previous levels for a total 2013 funding request of $3.962 billion. The fund pays local public housing authorities annual subsidies for such things as maintenance, management, insurance and energy costs. These should be the responsibility of local jurisdictions.
—David C. John, Senior Research Fellow
News from “The Hill” that you might have missed and will find interesting. Obama promises to veto any spending bills that cut into his Obamacare or his Jobs Bill. I don’t buy this bluff and I hope that Congress won’t either.
Veni, vidi veto: The Obama administration on Thursday told House and Senate appropriators that the president will veto any 2012 spending bills that contain provisions blocking top administration priorities like healthcare and financial reforms, The Hill’s Erik Wasson reports.
Revamping its semi-dormant mantra of “winning the future,” the White House also threatened a veto if the final version of spending bills cuts funding too much or fails to fund investments in education, innovation or infrastructure.
Perhaps not surprising: Republicans have latched on to a federal audit, released Thursday, that found that more than $3 billion worth of education credits could have been wrongly handed out by the IRS, our Bernie Becker reports.
“Enough is enough — it’s time for the IRS to start taking proactive measures to stop erroneous payments on the front end,” Rep. Charles Boustany Jr. (R-La.), the chairman of the House Ways and Means Oversight subcommittee, said in a statement.
Movement on the legislation to sell off excess federal property. I hope this includes getting out of the western states which are largely owned by the government. There is a lot of natural resources under those federally owned hills that the feds have been giving to private mining companies for mere pennies. If the property reverts to the states I don’t see this happening. governments closer to the people work more in sync with the wants and needs of the people.
More moves on bringing private companies and all their money back from overseas by giving a “holiday” on the far too excessive corporate taxes the United States charges it’s companies. The companies take their work and money overseas to avoid what are the highest corporation taxes in the world. The calls to tax the rich and tax the corporations so they rich and corporations do what you and I can not doe: they just leave the country! How dumb can Americans be??!
More noise about going after the Federal Reserve and Ben Bernanke. The Federal Reserve should never have been formed in the first place and given so much power over our money and therefore our whole economy and lives. BB
WHAT YOU MIGHT HAVE MISSED
— Sen. Sanders gathers economists for his planned Fed overhaul bill
— Bernanke says no more stimulus
— Senate housing bill would sell excess properties to foreign investors
— Good-government groups weigh in on repatriation
— Hensarling can see supercommittee overhauling tax code
— IRS makes 2012 inflation, cost-of-living adjustments
— Plan to shed excess federal properties marches onward
— House Dems to SEC: Make companies come clean on political spending
— Higginbottom confirmed as deputy OMB head
— Chamber of Commerce spends $45.8M on lobbying
— Existing home sales fell last month, still above 2010 levels
— Initial jobless claims fall slightly
It’s Time For A New Kind Of Bank Of America Solution—The Right Kind.
Read this article carefully because it outlines exactly what we should have done with the banks in 2008 instead of the massive bail out. Now the ones in power are planning another bail out for another failing bank. Failing due to massive incompetence! BB
- In: American Crash 2011 | Communism in America | Constitution of the United States of America | Economy/Money | Federal Reserve | Financial Industry Reform | national deficit, taxes, national budget | Politics 2008 | Politics 2009 | Politics 2010 | Politics 2011 | Subverting America by Uri Bezmenov
- 1 Comment
Why is the Price of Gold is Exploding While Inflation is Rising.
(Go to this site and listen to the videos)
Here’s some information I first ran in this newsletter more than FIVE years ago. The numbers have been updated, but the overall situation remains practically unchanged.
Have you always wondered why the price of gold has more than doubled recently (now about $1,600 per ounce), silver has tripled (now $40 per ounce) and your paycheck isn’t going as far as you need it to?
Inflation is rising! In case you didn’t realize it, there has been a 300 percent increase in inflation since the 1970s. If you have been curious about these issues, you will really enjoy watching the two videos above.
One is a short animation arguing for re-introduction of gold as money because of its independence. The other is a 45-minute video tutorial from one of my favorite economic teachers — the Ludwig von Mises Institute — that explains how the fractional reserve banking is debased. It also discusses the central bank and how the U.S. government transitioned into the Federal Reserve System that scrapped the gold standard in 1933 and established a global inflationary system.
In 1970, the price of gold was $37 an ounce. Now, 41 years later, it is setting records regularly and is over $1,700 an ounce. Nearly all of the over two dozen experts I follow in this area are universal in gold surpassing $2,000 sometime by the end of this year or close to it and with potential to rise to $5,000 to $10,000 per ounce. That is not as high as you might think, as it has already increased by 50X since 1970. That is less than five times increase. Silver is far more volatile and may actually increase ten times its current value or more.
Once you view the video, you will see the Federal Reserve System is actually the cause of inflation and one of the primary reasons why your financial future is uncertain.
While We the People have been distracted by the Debt Ceiling Debate much has been happening behind the “fray”.
Posted on: July 26, 2011
- In: American Crash 2011 | Big Labor Unions | Communism in America | Deficit Reduction Proposal | Economy/Money | Environment | EPA Environmental Protection Agency | Federal Reserve | Financial Industry Reform | Health Care | Ineffective Government Programs | Redistributing wealth | Republican House of Representatives 2011 | States revolt | Subverting America by Uri Bezmenov
- 16 Comments
Obama and his minions have always and ever used distraction to push their more horrific project, and this debt ceiling distraction is a real winner for them. See what has been going on in the background while we and TV news has been watching elsewhere. Or maybe you have been like me and tuning it all out! BB
On the floor: Meanwhile, the full House continues to debate the 2012 Interior and Environment appropriations bill, which Democrats say is the worst environmental bill to come before the House — ever. The bill contains 39 riders limiting the ability of the EPA to regulate; Democrats are attempting to strip out as many as possible.
Reviewing regulators: The Senate Banking Committee will be getting its vet on tomorrow, welcoming three nominees the White House wants to put at the center of the government’s financial regulation.
The trio scheduled to be on hand are: Martin Gruenberg, tapped to replace Sheila Bair at the top of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation; Thomas Curry, the choice for next comptroller of the currency; and Roy Woodall, the pick for insurance expert on the new Financial Stability Oversight Council. Financial regulatory nominees have had a rocky road in confirmation battles lately — here’s looking at you, Peter Diamond and Richard Cordray — so keep an eye open to see if these three fare better.
Consumption!: Mike Huckabee, the former Arkansas governor and GOP presidential candidate, is one of a deep bench — nine witnesses overall — talking consumption taxes at House Ways and Means tomorrow.
Huckabee and two others will discuss the Fair Tax, the idea of replacing federal taxes with a sizable national sales tax. The rest of the panelists will discuss the Value Added Tax, a consumption tax that has sparked skepticism from both the right and the left in this country. All that said, the VAT is quite popular in much of the rest of the industrialized world — where, perhaps not coincidentally, most countries also have a lower corporate tax rate.
If at first you don’t succeed … Senate Finance is going back to the well for a hearing on deficit reduction, three weeks or so after the debate over the pending trade deals caused the postponement of a previously scheduled discussion. Peter Orszag, the former White House budget director, is not scheduled to testify this time around, but Finance will hear from liberal and conservative experts.Speaking of which: The U.S. Chamber of Commerce is taking its case on those trade deals — with South Korea, Panama and Colombia — to Capitol Hill, holding a rally to help push for their passage. The agreements remained stalled due to disagreements over whether they should be linked to the Trade Adjustment Assistance program.
The briefing room: A more conservative group of congressional Republicans will be gathering tomorrow to unveil legislation that would tell the president what bills to pay if the government hits the debt ceiling. Under the bill, the administration would have to prioritize payments for debt service, Social Security and military pay before attending to other obligations. The RSC’s Jordan, Sen. Jim DeMint of South Carolina and others will be on hand to roll out EFFCUSPASSA — that’s the Ensuring the Full Faith and Credit of the United States and Protecting America’s Soldiers and Seniors Act, for those of you scoring at home.
Fed fulminating: Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas) will return to the fertile grounds of Federal Reserve bashing on Tuesday, with his House Financial Services subcommittee exploring how the central bank’s monetary policy affects the economy.
Specifically, the panel will discuss inflation, unemployment and the potential for a third round of “quantitative easing.” The Fed has said it is prepared to pump more stimulus into the economy if needed, but Ben Bernanke, the Fed chairman, has emphasized that nothing is in the works immediately. Thomas Hoenig, the president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City and no fan of the last QE experience, will be on hand to testify.
Risky renting: A second House Financial Services subcommittee will train its sights on the rent-to-own industry Tuesday, as lawmakers explore what regulators should or shouldn’t be doing as they monitor the agency.
Preparing for the floor: The House Rules Committee will meet to set up a bill that wades in to the spat between Boeing and the National Labor Relations Board over whether the aerospace giant shifted work to a South Carolina plant to punish union action in Washington state.
Last week, the House Education and the Workforce Committee marked up legislation sponsored by Rep. Tim Scott (R-S.C.) that not only bars the NLRB from shifting Boeing work back to Washington, but prohibits “ordering any employer to close, relocate or transfer employment under any circumstance.”
Quick hits:
— Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio) has a briefing of his own planned, titled “Eliminating the Debt and Creating Jobs without Raising Taxes.”
— Christine Lagarde, the new IMF chief, headlines an early morning Council on Foreign Relations conference call on the world economy.
— A Senate Judiciary subcommittee looks at the economic case for and against immigration reform.
— And dozens of religious figures head to the Hill for a prayer vigil on ensuring the poor don’t have to shoulder the burden of a debt deal.
Economic indicators:
— Standard & Poor’s is scheduled to release its Case–Shiller 20-city home price index for May.
— The Commerce Department is slated to circulate its report on new privately owned one-family houses sold and for sale in June, as the housing market struggles to show any improvement.
— And the Conference Board is set to drop its consumer confidence index for July, a way to examine potential spending habits of consumers, which represents 70 percent of the economy.
BREAKING MONDAY:
It’s not just in Washington: Concern about debt is everywhere. A new Associated Press/GfK poll found that one in five are worried about debt practically all the time, and more than one in three say they won’t be able to pay off their credit card bill.
And a break from the debt ceiling: Rep. Shelley Berkley (D-Nev.), Ways and Means member and Senate candidate, has introduced her own bill to allow U.S. multinationals to bring offshore profits home at a reduced tax rate, Bloomberg reports.
The lowest possible rate in the bill, 5.25 percent, matches the rate in a previous holiday and the one called for in another House proposal in this area. But a company’s rate could be as high as 25 percent under the plan, depending on its hiring practices.
WHAT YOU MIGHT HAVE MISSED:
On the Money’s Monday:
– Jim DeMint on Reid/Boehner plans: They’re both no good.
– IMF: The debt ceiling must be raised.
– The White House turns its head toward criminal syndicates.
– The IRS reverses course on its innocent-spouse policy.
– Joint Economic Committee: 32 states added private-sector jobs in June.
– House Oversight set to take a look at excess federal property.
– And audit finds the IRS needs to tighten up on homebuyer credit.
Feedback, etc., to bbecker@thehill.com
Congressional Budget Office on Fannie, Freddie and Mortgage Finance Options
Posted on: December 23, 2010
CBO on Fannie, Freddie and Mortgage Finance Options | Cato @ Liberty.
One of the many messes the unhousebroken Obama Administration and Democratic Congress has made for We the People to clean up is the full federal ownership of the two giant mortgage companies Fannie Mae and Freddy Mac. These companies under the influence of Rep. Barney Frank and Senator Chris Dodd have gobbled up every toxic mortgage mortgage bankers made in order to make the initial profit and knowing they could then sell them to Fannie or Freddie. It is probably the biggest mess this last democratic congress has made that we really can not just simply de-fund and therefore destroy as may be the case with Obamacare and some other stupidities. So what will the next Republican controlled House Congress do with the mess? This is the advise of the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office which has consistently;y advised against the government control of these once privately held companies.
CBO on Fannie, Freddie and Mortgage Finance Options
Posted by Mark A. Calabria
Just in time for the holidays,CBO ( Congressional Budget Office) has released its analysis of the costs and benefits of various alternatives to our current system of mortgage finance, particularly the role of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
The report examines three possibilities:
- A hybrid public/private model in which the government provides explicit guarantees on privately issued mortgages or MBSs;
- A fully public model in which a wholly federal entity would guarantee qualifying mortgages or MBSs; or
- A fully private model in which there would be no special federal backing for the secondary mortgage market.
The report doesn’t really push one option over another, but simply lays out the advantages and disadvantages of each. Some highlights worth keeping in mind as the debate continues into the new year:
“Relying on explicit government guarantees…would also have some disadvantages…If competition remained muted, with only a few…firms participating in the secondary market, limiting risk to the overall financial system and avoiding regulatory capture could be difficult…federal guarantees would reduce creditors’ incentive to monitor risk. Experience with other federal insurance and credit programs suggests that the government would have trouble setting risk-sensitive prices and would most likely end up imposing some cost and risk on taxpayers. In addition, a hybrid approach might not eliminate the frictions that arise between private and public missions.”
“Privatization might provide the strongest incentive for prudent behavior on the part of financial intermediaries by removing the moral hazard that federal guarantees create. By increasing competition in the secondary market, the privatization approach would reduce the market’s reliance on the viability of any one firm. Private markets may also be best positioned to allocate the credit risk and interest rate risk of mortgages efficiently, and they would probably be more innovative than a secondary market dominated by a fully federal agency. Further, privatization would eliminate the tension between public and private purposes inherent in the traditional GSE model.”
It is worth remembering that over the years, the CBO has actually been quite strong in warning against the dangers of the GSE model.** Sadly Congress simply chose to ignore those warnings. Here’s hoping that the CBO has little more influence on this issue than they’ve had in the past.
**The government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) are a group of financial services corporations created by the United States Congress. Their function is to enhance the flow of credit to targeted sectors of the economy and to make those segments of the capital market more efficient and transparent. The desired effect of the GSEs is to enhance the availability and reduce the cost of credit to the targeted borrowing sectors: agriculture, home finance and education. Congress created the first GSE in 1916 with the creation of the Farm Credit System; it initiated GSEs in the home finance segment of the economy with the creation of the Federal Home Loan Banks in 1932; and it targeted education when it chartered Sallie Mae in 1972 (although Congress allowed Sallie Mae to relinquish its government sponsorship and become a fully private institution via legislation in 1995). The residential mortgage borrowing segment is by far the largest of the borrowing segments in which the GSEs operate. GSEs hold or pool approximately $5 trillion worth of mortgages
Eugene Robinson – Tax cut fight highlights Democrats’ missing convictions
Posted on: December 4, 2010
- In: Consumer Financial Protection Bureau | Dodd-Frank Financial Reform Bill | Economy/Money | Federal Reserve | Financial Industry Reform | Obama admistration | Obama's moratorium on drilling in the Gulf | Obamanation | Politics 2008 | Politics 2009 | Politics 2010 | Progressives Movement to Destroy America | Republican's Pledge to America | Subverting America by Uri Bezmenov | TARP Financial industry bailout | Taxes
- 9 Comments
Eugene Robinson – Tax cut fight highlights Democrats’ missing convictions.
I just could not resist bringing your attention to this article by the Rabid Right Winger Eugene Robinson. How can otherwise intelligent people be so very stupidly absurd when it comes to their political views? How? I hear them or read them and if I am not angry or sickened by idiocy I am amazed at how they can twist and turn and bend the hall of goofy mirrors to rant for the impossible.
The rant over the Bush Tax Cuts which will be the Obama Tax hikes is typical. By the way I have to say that these tax hikes are typical of everything Obama and his Democrats have done: monstrous!
Anyhow, getting back to Robinson’s rant:
In other words, there’s no additional money in the national coffers for the victims of the most devastating recession since the Great Depression. But to help investment bankers start the new year right, perhaps with a new Mercedes or a bit of sun in the Caribbean? Step right up, and we’ll write you a check.”
Don’t look now Mr. Robinson but it was the Democrats that handed out all those bail-outs and buy-outs (GM and AIG), stimulus packages that went to banks also after first being bailed out so they could disperse the money to small businesses but they kept it instead and then gave themselves those bonuses while the Republicans (Party of No) repeatedly voted No to all that out of control nation destroying spending the last four years. The Dems have been in power since 2006 remember and refused to curb the mortgage lending urged on by Dem Rep. Barney Frank and Dem Senator Chris Dodd that ultimately led to all the Wall Street smoke and mirrors trading because they knew that Freddie Mac and Fannie mae would buy the toxic paper and the US Treasury (tax payers) would bail-out Freddie and Fanny. Actually we the tax payers thanks to our Congress now own Fanny and Freddie along with GM and AIG.
And while I am here I would like to remind you that the “most devastating recession since the Great Depression.” can also be laid at the feet of the Democrats and Obama because the unholy spending has caused businesses to pull back and stop hiring and start instead to trim their workforce. Then Obama came along later and stopped all drilling in the Gulf of Mexico thus making for 400,000 more jobs lost. It just amazes me that you are a national columnist but you seem to have missed these events. BB
You can now read the whole article if you want
, and then if you want you can rant a bit in the comment section. It doesn’t do any real good except to empty your spleen. Then again that’s a good thing too. BB






Recent Comments