>>Islam envoy retreats on terror talk – Josh Gerstein – POLITICO.com
Posted February 20, 2010on:
- In: Barack Obama | Communism in America | Islam, Muslim, jihad, terrorist | Jihad in America | Middle East and Muslims | Muslims in the United States | Obama admistration | Obamanation | President Obama, Congress, Democrats, Republicans, Islam, Muslim, terrorists, | Progressives Movement to Destroy America | Subverting America by Uri Bezmenov
- Leave a Comment
Thanks to my friend Fred for this referral. :) BB
For those of you who have forgotten Rashad Hussein is President Barack Obama’s new Islamic envoy. Be sure to read the entire article and do listen to the video. And please read the entire article even tho it is long because it quotes Hussein a lot. First, I wonder why an Islamic envoy is needed and second I really am concerned about this particular person being in our White House and privy to so much information. You will be too when you read what he has to say.
More and more i Am coming to believe like so many who are now cropping up: Barack Obama and his cohorts are dangerous to the American people, he is a traitor surrounded by traitors. He should be impeached along with Joe Biden and Nancy Pelosi and a whole new batch of people put in their place. Then like any good clean sweep we should change all the locks and codes.
admitting that he made sharply critical statements about a U.S. terror prosecution against a Muslim professor after initially saying he had no recollection of making such comments.
“I made statements on that panel that I now recognize were ill-conceived or not well-formulated,” Hussain said, referring to a 2004 conference at which he discussed the case.
Hussain’s reversal came after POLITICO obtained a recording of his presentation to a Muslim students’ conference in Chicago during which he can be heard portraying the government’s cases towards professor Sami Al-Arian, as well as other Muslim terrorism suspects, as “politically motivated persecutions.” Al-Arian later pled guilty to aiding terrorists.Hussain refers to some provisions of the Patriot Act as “horrible” and called “dangerous” an aspect of that law that allows intelligence-related surveillance to be used in criminal cases. Most lawmakers, including many Democrats critical of the Patriot Act, have said the provision has proved valuable, because it removed a wall that made it difficult for those pursuing investigations of international terror or spying operations to share information with criminal investigators. Hussain did express support for other aspects of the law, including a provision permitting so-called roving wiretaps.
In the current version of the story on the Washington Report’s website, there is no reference to Hussain’s comments, or even that he appeared at the 2004 conference. But earlier, cached versions of the same story do include the comments — initially adding to the mystery of why they were taken out and at whose request. The discrepancy was first noted in a story last Sunday in the Web-based Global Muslim Brotherhood Daily Report.
A Washington Report editor initially said the author of its article requested the change because Laila Al-Arian’s comments had been misattributed to Hussain. However, in an e-mail to POLITICO, the author, Shereen Kandil, stood by her reporting and denied she ever made such a request.
In addition, both Laila Al-Arian and Kandil, who now works in the Obama administration at the Environmental Protection Agency, said they were never consulted before the passages referring to Hussain were deleted. The deletion took place sometime between October 2007 and this year, according to the Internet Archive, though the version available in Nexis was never modified.
The changes made some three years or more after his speech have led to speculation that Hussain was sanitizing his record to smooth his path to a White House legal post. However, the strident criticism he offered of the Justice Department’s handling of various alleged terrorism cases raises the possibility that his remarks could have posed a problem when he was applying for work at Justice in 2008. He joined the agency in the last year of the Bush administration as a trial attorney handling civil cases against the government, a Justice spokeswoman said.
While the audio shows that Hussain did utter the phrase “politically motivated persecutions” in the midst of his discussion about Sami Al-Arian, another comment Kandil attributed to Hussain, describing Al-Arian as being “used politically to squash dissent,” is not audible in the recording POLITICO obtained, which cuts off before any question-and-answer period.
Hussain’s remarks about Al-Arian appear to have been extemporaneous, but he seemed to have prepared in advance his denunciation of the Bush administration’s handling of other terrorism-related detentions and prosecutions.