And So I Go: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow

This Week’s YOU CUT. Vote the cuts you want Congress to make.

Posted on: May 30, 2010

Welcome to YouCut

YouCut – a first-of-its-kind project – is designed to defeat the permissive culture of runaway spending in Congress. It allows you to vote, both online and on your cell phone, on spending cuts that you want to see the House enact. Vote on this page today for your priorities and together we can begin to change Washington’s culture of spending into a culture of savings.

Refocus National Archives Activities On Preserving Federal Records
$10 million in Savings in the First Year
($100 Million Over Ten Years)

The National Archives and Records Administration and the National Historical Publications and Records Commission are charged with managing Federal records. However, they also spend approximately $10 million a year on grants for state and local governments, universities and other institutions to preserve and publish non-Federal records. While a worthwhile goal, the federal government also spends $167.5 million a year on the National Endowment for the Humanities and $282 million for the Institute for Museum and Library Services which can and sometimes do fund projects towards similar ends. Refocusing the National Archives on its core mission of preserving Federal records would save taxpayers $10 million next year and $100 million over ten years.
Reform Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac
Savings estimated at $30 billion.
Since taking over Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the two government sponsored mortgage-backing companies, taxpayers have injected over $145 billion into the two companies. Yet Congress still has not considered proposals to reform these companies and recoup taxpayer funds. The Congressional Budget Office has estimated that absent reform, costs to taxpayer will continue to grow. Taking action to reform these companies now (as opposed to delaying action as some have proposed) by ending their government conservatorship, shrinking their portfolios, establishing minimum capital standards, and bringing transparency to taxpayer exposure could generate savings of up to an estimated $30 billion.
Terminate Broadcasting Facility Grant Programs that Have Completed their Mission
$25 million in Savings in the First Year
($250 million Over Ten Years)

In his most recent budget, President Obama proposed terminating the Public Broadcasting Grants at the Department of Agriculture and the Public Telecommunications Facilities Grants Program at the Department of Commerce. The president’s budget justified terminating these programs, noting that: “Since 2004, the USDA Public Broadcasting Grants program has provided grants to support rural public television stations’ conversion to digital broadcasting. Digital conversion efforts mandated by the Federal Communications Commission are now largely complete, and there is no further need for this program.” …additionally: “Since 2000, most PTFP awards have supported public television stations’ conversion to digital broadcasting. The digital television transition was completed in 2009, and there is no further need for DOC’s program.”
Reduce Spending on Non-Essential and Questionable Research
$3.8 Million in Savings in the First Year
Since passage of the stimulus bill in February of 2009, watchdogs and media outlets have identified countless examples of wasteful, unnecessarily duplicative, and outrageous expenditures. Unfortunately, most of these expenditures only come to light after the money has been spent. This is particularly true in the area of research grants. Examples of grants made with stimulus funds about which questions have been raised after the grant was awarded include: a study on why young adults use malt liquor and marijuana in combination ($389,357); the impact of alcohol on the “hookup” behavior of female college coeds ($219,000); studying whether mice become disoriented when they consume alcohol ($8,408); developing a program for “machine-generated humor” ($712,883); studying methamphetamines and the female rat sex drive ($28,900); studying the tension between privacy and features in online social networks like Facebook ($498,000); testing how to control private home appliances in Martha’s Vineyard, Massachusetts from an off-site computer ($787,250); developing the next generation of football gloves ($150,000); examining the division of labor in ant colonies ($950,000); and studying the Icelandic Arctic environment in the Viking Age ($94,902). While we cannot recapture money that has already been spent, this proposal would reduce funding dollar-for-dollar at each agency that approved the grants described above.
Consolidate and Reduce Funding for Federal Advisory Committees
$34 million in Savings in the First Year
($170 Million Over Five Years)

In 2008, the Federal government spent $342 million on 917 active Federal Advisory Committees. These committees had nearly 64,000 total members. Many of these committees are duplicative. For example, the National Endowment for the Arts spent $1.3 million on two separate advisory panels, both of which makes recommendations to the NEA chairman. At the U.S. Geological Survey, the Scientific Earthquake Studies Advisory Committee actually recommended the creation of the National Earthquake Prediction Council. Now taxpayers fund both committees at a cost of nearly $200,000 a year. These earthquake committees are in addition to a third committee run by the Department of Commerce that costs taxpayers another $43,000. In 2005, the Department of Interior even created an advisory committee to advise it on dog management at the Golden Gate National Recreation Area. Three years later, this committee cost taxpayers $41,000. Consolidating existing advisory committees and with a goal of reducing overall funding by 10% would save taxpayers $34 million next year and $170 million over five years.
Then, Submit Your Ideas for Spending Cuts

YouCut is designed to defeat the permissive culture of spending in Congress. After you vote on this week’s choices, we need your help in identifying which program and spending cuts should be featured on this website each week. Click the button below to submit your ideas!


Previous Cuts Chosen By the Public

Each week, the public votes on which items should be brough to the House Floor. Here is a list of previous winning items.

Week One: Cut the New Non-Reformed Welfare Program ($2.5 Billion Savings)

Week Two: Eliminate Federal Employee Pay Raise ($30 Billion Savings)

5 Responses to "This Week’s YOU CUT. Vote the cuts you want Congress to make."

Water is the most important source to hydrate your body and eyes and joints, but if you hate your taste of tap water in particular chlorine, how could it be water to drink? You know what damage might have on the environment because your empty plastic bottle?
You are free to buy cheap cotton and charcoal filter, and set it has changed little over your cock, but you still taste like chlorine in the water, nothing can be clarity of your water.

The taste of the filter is damaged, you must change now, not to mention the slow flow of water, I was a victim once.

Now imagine that the system exists to kill 99%, if not all the germs in drinking water and improve the taste of your water, you taste the spring water. Here it is technology that ultraviolet lamps, ultraviolet light is now to make your drinking water?

We hate the taste of our tap water. Even our dog and rabbits refused to drink it. So we use 10 gallons a week of bottled water. I hate the polluting so we take the plastic gallon jugs to the recycling center. They will not however take the smaller individual bottles of water plastic. We have tried several types of water filters and systems and still the water is awful.

I remember as a kid using springs, artesian wells and deep wells for our water. Sometimes people tapped into a bed of sulfur water that smelled like rotten eggs but was not harmful to drink. Now all water is suspect due to the pollution from factories and even fertilizers that is leaching into our underground aquifer. BB

You are on the post for voting your say on bills in the House of Representatives. Did you vote? It is really easy: just click on the word vote in the boxes above and follow directions. BB

It’s sad that pollution is everywhere. People forget about the important of our nature, especially water.

It’s not as bad as it used to be tho. And it was the first 70 years of the 20th. century that created all the pollution. We are merely living with the effects of it now.

I remember the sweet spring water when I was a kid but I also remember the filthy steel mills, the strip mining and just leaving the devastated land and the chemical plants that poured their wastes into the Ohio River. These things are no longer happening, but so much damage has already been done.

Thanks for stopping by Money. I like your moniker; is it wishful thinking or do you have a tree? 🙂 BB

You like to hold a celebration with a barbeque? Starting from simple devices to the high-tech here. You just choose according to your needs, not a practical or a big size. Let’s look at the coverage together.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

See topic cloud at bottom of page for specific topics.

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 97 other followers

BB’s file cabinet

%d bloggers like this: