- In: Barack Obama | Communism in America | Economy/Money | Health Care | Health Care Reform Summary | Know the enemies of America | Obama admistration | Obama Against America | Obama and ethics | Obama Executive Decress | Obamanation | Obamcare repeal and replace | Subverting America by Uri Bezmenov
- Leave a Comment
I knew there was a monster hidden in the 2000+ pages of the Obamacare bill but wasn’t about to read the entire bill and try to find it myself. Besides I simply don’t have the knowledge of government-speak or lawyerese to have spotted it anyhow. But Cato Institute experts found the hidden law within the law that was made for a dictator to control our lives completely from cradle to grave. This law within the law makes all of our government irrelevant and subservient to one un-elected person whose word would be law with no recourse even to sue him/her. Read every word of the following report carefully and then see that your Congressman has a copy and understands just how hatefully insidious this law is. BB
Posted by Michael F. Cannon
Today, the Cato Institute releases a new study by Diane Cohen and me titled, “The Independent Payment Advisory Board: PPACA’s Anti-Constitutional and Authoritarian Super-Legislature.” Cohen is a senior attorney at the Goldwater Institute and lead counsel in theCoons v. Geithner lawsuit challenging IPAB and other aspects of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010, a.k.a. ObamaCare.
From the executive summary:
When the unelected government officials on this board submit a legislative proposal to Congress, it automatically becomes law: PPACA ( Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010, a.k.a. ObamaCare. ) requires the Secretary of Health and Human Services to implement it. Blocking an IPAB (Independent Payment Advisory Board “proposal” requires at a minimum that the House and the Senate and the president agree on a substitute. The Board’s edicts therefore can become law without congressional action, congressional approval, meaningful congressional oversight, or being subject to a presidential veto. Citizens will have no power to challenge IPAB’s edicts in court.
Worse, PPACA forbids Congress from repealing IPAB outside of a seven-month window in the year 2017, and even then requires a three-fifths majority in both chambers…
IPAB’s unelected members will have effectively unfettered power to impose taxes and ration care for all Americans, whether the government pays their medical bills or not. In some circumstances, just one political party or even one individual would have full command of IPAB’s lawmaking powers. IPAB truly is independent, but in the worst sense of the word. It wields power independent of Congress, independent of the president, independent of the judiciary, and independent of the will of the people.
The creation of IPAB is an admission that the federal government’s efforts to plan America’s health care sector have failed. It is proof of the axiom that government control of the economy threatens democracy.
Importantly, this study reveals a heretofore unreported feature that makes this super-legislature even more authoritarian and unconstitutional:
[I]f Congress misses that repeal window, PPACA prohibits Congress from ever altering an IPAB “proposal.”
You read that right.
The Congressional Research Service and others have reported that even if Congress fails to repeal this super-legislature in 2017, Congress will still be able to use the weak tools that ObamaCare allows for restraining IPAB. Unfortunately, that interpretation rests on a misreading of a crucial part of the law. These experts thought they saw the word “or” where the statute actually says “and.”
How much difference can one little conjunction make?
Under the statute as written, if Congress fails to repeal IPAB in 2017, then as of 2020 Congress will have absolutely zero ability to block or amend the laws that IPAB writes, and zero power to affect the Secretary’s implementation of those laws. IPAB will become a permanent super-legislature, with the Secretary as its executive. And if the president fails to appoint any IPAB members, the Secretary will unilaterally wield all of IPAB’s legislative andexecutive powers, including the power to appropriate funds for her own department. It’s completely nutty, yet completely consistent with the desire of ObamaCare’s authors to protect IPAB from congressional interference.
It’s also completely consistent with Friedrich Hayek’s prediction that government planning of the economy paves the way for authoritarianism.Michael F. Cannon • June 14, 2012 @ 2:36 pm
Filed under: General; Government and Politics; Health Care; Law and Civil Liberties
Tags: aca, authoritarianism, Barack Obama, big government, Congress,Congressional Research Service, Constitution, coons v. geithner, CRS,death panels, democracy, diane cohen, economy, federal spending, fiscal policy, freedom, friedrich hayek, goldwater institute, government,government spending, Health, health care reform, health insurance, hhs,IPAB, jennifer haberkorn, market, Medicare, obama, Obamacare, ppaca,President Obama, regulation, rwjf, spending, super congress, super-legislature, Supreme Court, taxation, the road to serfdom