Immigration Reform or Amnesty?
Posted April 19, 2013on:
Seems to me the immigration bill now in the Senate “Gang of Eight” is the same old thing over and over again that we Americans have had from our government for 30+ years: amnesty for people who broke our laws and sneaked into our country then after they got here they demand we give them all the rights of citizenship which of course includes all the “goodies” and “freebies”. Senator Rubio is trying to get a fair bill and a fair hearing but the Democrats who control the Senate have stated they will allow only one debate and then they want a fast passage of their bill. Fast passage as in ”’we have to pass the bill to learn what is in it”!
I believe that we must do something about our immigration policy. I especially abhor the fact that one family member is in and every relative including “kissin’ cousins” are then allowed to come in. This is wrong. Immediate family members only should be permitted to follow an individual into our country, and this does not include the parents! Husband, wife and dependent children..operative word here is “dependent ” children.
Above all we must secure our borders! And this has never been done and is even less likely to be done under Obama and the Democrats who are dependent upon the Hispanic vote. Anyhow, the following article by former Senator Jim DeMint who is now head of Heritage Foundation gives some important insights and the entire bill as it was presented in the Senate so you read it and decide for yourself Dear Reader. BB
Since the birth of our nation, the United States has recognized the vital role of lawful immigration, as it brings important economic and cultural benefits. We have always been, and will continue to be, a nation of immigrants.
We are also a nation of laws. The “Gang of Eight” bill introduced in the U.S. Senate violates the very rule of law principle that creates opportunity for immigrants and makes America a beacon of hope for the world. Giving legal residency to the 11 million people who came here illegally has one definition: amnesty. Amnesty rewards unlawful behavior and diminishes opportunity and prosperity for lawful immigrants and all Americans.
The Senate bill imposes significant costs on taxpayers. At a time of trillion-dollar deficits and $17 trillion in debt, the cost of implementing amnesty and the strain it will add to already fragile entitlement and welfare programs should be of serious concern for everyone.
After decades of empty promises on immigration enforcement, Congress simply lacks credibility to keep its promises. A comprehensive amnesty bill was tried before and it failed. In 1986 we had about 3 million unlawful immigrants. Congress granted them legal status with a promise to control our borders and fix our legal immigration system.
Lawmakers who supported the 1986 bill promised in grand speeches that amnesty would never happen again. Now there are 11 million unlawful immigrants in America because amnesty was immediate but the border wasn’t secured, workplace laws were not enforced, and our legal immigration system was not fixed. The result of amnesty is clear — it encourages more unlawful immigration in hopes of future amnesties.
This new bill is much the same as the last: immediate amnesty in the form of provisional status within months and lofty promises of “strategies” and “plans” for enforcement years later.
Rather than rewarding the 11 million who broke our laws, Congress should first consider how to make the immigration system work for the more than 4 million people waiting patiently outside our borders to come to our country legally. A rational system would make it easier to follow the law than to break it.
Instead of passing another incomprehensible comprehensive immigration bill, Congress should debate and develop understandable reforms in a transparent step-by-step process that addresses all of the immigration issues. This will build trust with the American people and unite the country rather than divide it.